Rosenman S J, Mackinnon A
Woden Valley Hospital, Canberra, ACT.
Aust J Public Health. 1992 Dec;16(4):419-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1992.tb00090.x.
This paper examines how general practitioner numbers, bulk-billing rates and sociodemographic variables determined usage of general practitioners and services delivered over the period from 1984 to 1990. A 10 per cent sample of patient services, maintained by the Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services, provided the data. Data were aggregated into 148 electorates. Separate regression analyses examined the determinants of the proportion of the population attending a general practitioner and of the number of general practitioner services delivered per patient. Determinants of the growth of these levels over the seven-year period were also examined. Region (metropolitan versus rural), age structure and general practitioner supply were significant factors in these analyses. Bulk-billing rates explained nine per cent of variance in patient numbers and 22 per cent of variance in service numbers after sociodemographic variables and general practitioner supply had been taken into account. The analyses suggest that bulk-billing and general practitioner supply influence the behaviour of patients and doctors and that the effect of bulk-billing is independent of indices of medical need. This implies that bulk-billing may increase service rates and this increase is not clearly directed to improving access to medically necessary services. Because no measures of treatment outcome are available. it is not possible to decide whether the effects observed represent an improvement in health care or are better seen as overuse by patients and demand inducement by practitioners.
本文研究了1984年至1990年期间全科医生数量、批量计费率和社会人口统计学变量如何决定全科医生的使用情况以及所提供服务的使用情况。由联邦卫生、住房和社区服务部维护的10%的患者服务样本提供了数据。数据被汇总到148个选区。分别进行的回归分析研究了就诊于全科医生的人口比例以及每位患者接受的全科医生服务数量的决定因素。还研究了这两个水平在七年期间增长的决定因素。在这些分析中,地区(城市与农村)、年龄结构和全科医生供应是重要因素。在考虑了社会人口统计学变量和全科医生供应后,批量计费率解释了患者数量差异的9%和服务数量差异的22%。分析表明,批量计费和全科医生供应会影响患者和医生的行为,并且批量计费的效果独立于医疗需求指标。这意味着批量计费可能会提高服务率,而且这种提高并不明确指向改善获得必要医疗服务的机会。由于没有治疗结果的衡量指标,因此无法确定所观察到的效果是代表了医疗保健的改善,还是更应被视为患者的过度使用和从业者的需求诱导。