• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北欧的私有化与私立医疗保健。

Nordic privatization and private healthcare.

作者信息

Ovretveit John

机构信息

The Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenberg, Box 12133, Sweden, S-40242.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2003 Jul-Sep;18(3):233-46. doi: 10.1002/hpm.712.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.712
PMID:12968800
Abstract

The role of the private sector in public healthcare systems is much debated, but there is little research to inform the debate. In the Nordic countries the extent and type of private sector involvement is largely unknown and the changes and the consequences have not been studied. This paper presents a conceptual framework and some limited data about the changing private-public mix and privatization in the Nordic countries between 1985 and 2000. The data suggest a small increase in both private financing and provision which has accelerated in recent years, especially in specific healthcare fields such as diagnostic centres, dentistry, primary medical care and care for older people. The overall increase is small, but large in certain sectors. Differences between the countries can only be understood in relation to their historical, financial, economic and political context, even though there are many commonalities. Impact also is context dependent, but the findings do show a cross-country pattern of a willingness to experiment and a change in underlying assumptions. The findings show a more extensive interpenetration of private and public than previously recognized but more research is required, especially about changes in recent years about which data are scarce. The paper considers the factors driving these trends, the likely larger changes in the next 10 years and the possible consequences for patients, professionals, managers and governments. It notes the different ways governments can control or influence finance and provision. It proposes that the Nordic and other governments improve regulation and data collection about the private sector and consider influencing private providers through partnership arrangements, rather than leaving the developments to be shaped by growing consumer demands or market logic alone.

摘要

私营部门在公共医疗体系中的作用备受争议,但用于为该辩论提供参考的研究却很少。在北欧国家,私营部门参与的程度和类型很大程度上尚不明确,其变化及后果也未得到研究。本文提出了一个概念框架,并给出了一些关于1985年至2000年间北欧国家公私混合情况变化及私有化的有限数据。数据表明,私营融资和服务供给均略有增加,且近年来增速加快,尤其是在诊断中心、牙科、初级医疗保健和老年人护理等特定医疗领域。总体增幅较小,但某些部门增幅较大。尽管各国之间存在许多共性,但只有结合其历史、财政、经济和政治背景才能理解它们之间的差异。影响也取决于具体情况,但研究结果确实显示出一种跨国的试验意愿模式以及基本假设的变化。研究结果表明,公私部门之间的相互渗透比之前认识到的更为广泛,但仍需要更多研究,特别是关于近年来变化的数据,目前这方面的数据很稀缺。本文考虑了推动这些趋势的因素、未来10年可能出现的更大变化以及对患者、专业人员、管理人员和政府可能产生的后果。文中指出了政府控制或影响融资及服务供给的不同方式。建议北欧及其他国家的政府加强对私营部门的监管和数据收集,并考虑通过伙伴关系安排来影响私营服务提供者,而不是任由发展仅由不断增长的消费者需求或市场逻辑来塑造。

相似文献

1
Nordic privatization and private healthcare.北欧的私有化与私立医疗保健。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2003 Jul-Sep;18(3):233-46. doi: 10.1002/hpm.712.
2
The Gateway Paper--health service delivery outside of the public sector in Pakistan.《关键报告》——巴基斯坦公共部门以外的医疗服务提供情况
J Pak Med Assoc. 2006 Dec;56(12 Suppl 4):S66-77.
3
Mechanisms behind privatization: a case study of private growth in Swedish elderly care.私有化背后的机制:瑞典老年护理领域私营化发展的案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(5):903-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
4
Privatization of social services: quality differences in Swedish elderly care.社会服务的私有化:瑞典老年护理中的质量差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Feb;72(4):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
5
Health care in China: the role of non-government providers.中国的医疗保健:非政府提供者的作用。
Health Policy. 2006 Jul;77(2):212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.002. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
6
The political process and the private health sector's role in Vietnam.越南的政治进程与私营卫生部门的作用。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1996 Jul-Sep;11(3):217-30. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199607)11:3<217::AID-HPM433>3.0.CO;2-L.
7
The private-public mix of healthcare: evidence from a decentralised NHS country.医疗保健的公私混合:来自一个实行医疗服务体系分权制国家的证据。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2006 Jul;1(Pt 3):277-98. doi: 10.1017/S1744133106003045.
8
Competition heats up in Chile. Healthcare reform proposals seek increasing role for nation's private sector.
Mod Healthc. 2001 Nov 5;31(45):26, 35.
9
Beyond the public-private debate: the mixed economy of health.超越公私之争:医疗卫生混合经济
Health Policy. 1996 Jan;35(1):75-93. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(95)00770-9.
10
India plans to expand private sector in healthcare review.印度计划在医疗保健审查中扩大私营部门。
BMJ. 2003 Mar 8;326(7388):520. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7388.520/d.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Privatization on Healthcare System: A Systematic Review.私有化对医疗体系的影响:一项系统综述
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2024 Apr-Jun;12(2):125-133. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_510_23. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
A critical look at the Portuguese public-private partnerships in healthcare.对葡萄牙医疗保健公私合作伙伴关系的批判性观察。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Mar;36(2):302-315. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3084. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
3
Which patients receive surgery in for-profit and non-profit hospitals in a universal health system? An explorative register-based study in Norway.
在全民医疗体系中,营利性医院和非营利性医院里哪些患者会接受手术治疗?挪威一项基于登记数据的探索性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 9;8(6):e019780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019780.
4
Quality differences between private for-profit, private non-profit and public hospitals in Norway: a retrospective national register-based study of acute readmission rates following total hip and knee arthroplasties.挪威私立营利性、私立非营利性和公立医院之间的质量差异:一项基于全国登记数据的回顾性研究,分析全髋关节和膝关节置换术后的急性再入院率。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e015771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015771.
5
Is the quality of primary healthcare services influenced by the healthcare centre's type of ownership?-An observational study of patient perceived quality, prescription rates and follow-up routines in privately and publicly owned primary care centres.基层医疗服务的质量是否受到医疗中心所有制类型的影响?——一项关于私立和公立基层医疗中心患者感知质量、处方率及随访流程的观察性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 26;15:417. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1082-y.
6
The impacts of occupational risks and their effects on work stress levels of health professional (The sample from the Southeast region of Turkey).职业风险的影响及其对卫生专业人员工作压力水平的作用(来自土耳其东南部地区的样本)
Environ Health Prev Med. 2015 Nov;20(6):410-21. doi: 10.1007/s12199-015-0481-3. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
7
Dental insurance: A systematic review.牙科保险:一项系统综述。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 Dec;4(Suppl 2):S73-7. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.146200.
8
Does healthcare financing converge? Evidence from eight OECD countries.医疗保健融资会趋同吗?来自八个经合组织国家的证据。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2013 Dec;13(3-4):279-300. doi: 10.1007/s10754-013-9132-7. Epub 2013 Sep 15.
9
Involving patients in treatment decisions - a delicate balancing act for Swedish dentists.让患者参与治疗决策——瑞典牙医的一项微妙平衡之举。
Health Expect. 2014 Aug;17(4):500-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00778.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
10
Inequity in the use of physician services in Norway before and after introducing patient lists in primary care.挪威在引入初级保健患者名单前后医生服务使用的不公平现象。
Int J Equity Health. 2011 Jun 15;10:25. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-25.