Department of economics, University of Bergen, Pb 7802, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Int J Equity Health. 2011 Jun 15;10:25. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-25.
Inequity in use of physician services has been detected even within health care systems with universal coverage of the population through public insurance schemes. In this study we analyse and compare inequity in use of physician visits (GP and specialists) in Norway based on data from the Surveys of Living Conditions for the years 2000, 2002 and 2005. A patient list system was introduced for GPs in 2001 to improve GP accessibility, strengthen the stability of the patient-doctor relationship and ensure equity in the use of health care services for the entire population.
We measure horizontal inequity by concentration indices and investigate changes in inequity over time when decomposing the concentration indices into the contribution of its determinants.
We find that pro-rich inequity in the probability of seeing a private outpatient specialist has declined, but still existed in 2005.
Improved patient-doctor stability as well as better GP accessibility facilitated by the introduction of patient lists improved access to private specialist services. In particular the less well off benefited from this reform.
即使在通过公共保险计划全民覆盖的医疗保健系统中,也已经发现医生服务使用方面存在不公平现象。在这项研究中,我们根据 2000 年、2002 年和 2005 年生活条件调查的数据,分析和比较了挪威基于就诊次数(全科医生和专科医生)的使用不公平现象。2001 年为全科医生引入了患者名单系统,以改善全科医生的可及性,加强医患关系的稳定性,并确保全民公平地使用医疗保健服务。
我们通过集中指数衡量水平不公平,并在分解集中指数的决定因素时,调查不公平现象随时间的变化。
我们发现,看私人门诊专科医生的概率存在有利于富人的不公平现象,这一现象在 2005 年仍然存在。
通过引入患者名单,改善医患稳定性和提高全科医生可及性,改善了对私人专科服务的获取。特别是,改革使不太富裕的人受益。