Bharti N, Madan R, Mohanty P R, Kaul H L
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Oct;47(9):1101-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00186.x.
The antinociceptive action of intrathecal midazolam is well documented. In this prospective study, we investigated the addition of midazolam to intrathecal bupivacaine on the duration and quality of spinal blockade.
Forty ASA I or II adult patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery were selected for the study. The patients were randomly allocated to receive 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally either alone or with 1 mg of midazolam using a combined spinal epidural technique. The duration and quality of sensory and motor block, perioperative analgesia, haemodynamic changes, and sedation levels were assessed.
The duration of sensory block (i.e. time to regression to the S2 segment) was significantly longer in the midazolam group than the control group (218 min vs. 165 min; P < 0.001). The duration of motor block was also prolonged in the midazolam group as compared with the control group (P < 0.01). In 90% of the patients in the midazolam group, the quality of block was adequate during the intra-operative period as compared with only 65% of the patients in the control group (P < 0.05). The duration of effective analgesia was longer in the midazolam group than in the control group (199 vs. 103 min; P < 0.001). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and sedation scores were comparable in both groups. No neurological deficit or other significant adverse effects were recorded.
The addition of intrathecal midazolam to bupivacaine significantly improves the duration and quality of spinal anaesthesia and provides prolonged perioperative analgesia without significant side-effects.
鞘内注射咪达唑仑的抗伤害感受作用已有充分记录。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们探讨了在鞘内布比卡因中添加咪达唑仑对脊髓阻滞的持续时间和质量的影响。
选择40例接受下腹部手术的ASA I或II级成年患者进行研究。采用联合脊髓硬膜外技术,将患者随机分为两组,分别鞘内注射3 ml 0.5%的重比重布比卡因,其中一组单独注射,另一组联合1 mg咪达唑仑。评估感觉和运动阻滞的持续时间和质量、围手术期镇痛、血流动力学变化及镇静水平。
咪达唑仑组感觉阻滞持续时间(即恢复至S2节段的时间)显著长于对照组(218分钟对165分钟;P<0.001)。与对照组相比,咪达唑仑组运动阻滞持续时间也延长(P<0.01)。术中,咪达唑仑组90%的患者阻滞质量良好,而对照组仅为65%(P<0.05)。咪达唑仑组有效镇痛持续时间长于对照组(199对103分钟;P<0.001)。两组的血压、心率、血氧饱和度及镇静评分相当。未记录到神经功能缺损或其他显著不良反应。
在布比卡因中添加鞘内注射咪达唑仑可显著改善脊髓麻醉的持续时间和质量,并提供延长的围手术期镇痛,且无明显副作用。