Lehr J L, Ramirez I F, Karlon W J, Eisenberg S R
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1992 Nov;30(6):621-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02446794.
The most widely used defibrillation dosing strategy is that adopted by the American Heart Association in 1986. However, several alternative dosing strategies have been proposed to match delivered energy to the individual requirements of defibrillation subjects. In this study, two-dimensional finite element methods are used to investigate the performance of four of these dosing strategies applied to three thoracic models representative of men and women of different thoracic aspect ratios. From the resulting current density distributions, the relative effectiveness of the following dosing strategies are evaluated and compared: constant current; current proportional to body weight; constant energy; energy proportional to body weight. Our results show that the strategy of applying current proportional to subject body weight with a current dose of 0.58 A kg-1 was able to defibrillate all three subjects with only minimal overexposure of any one of them. None of the other dosing strategies examined could be made to successfully defibrillate all three subjects without significantly overexposing at least one.
应用最广泛的除颤剂量策略是美国心脏协会于1986年采用的策略。然而,已经提出了几种替代剂量策略,以使输送的能量与除颤对象的个体需求相匹配。在本研究中,二维有限元方法用于研究将这些剂量策略中的四种应用于代表不同胸廓纵横比的男性和女性的三种胸廓模型时的性能。从所得的电流密度分布中,评估并比较以下剂量策略的相对有效性:恒流;与体重成正比的电流;恒能;与体重成正比的能量。我们的结果表明,以0.58 A kg-1的电流剂量应用与受试者体重成正比的电流的策略能够使所有三名受试者除颤,而其中任何一人的过度暴露都微乎其微。所检查的其他剂量策略中,没有一种能够在不使至少一人明显过度暴露的情况下成功使所有三名受试者除颤。