• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威斯康星州奶农职业伤害干预措施的评估。

Evaluation of an occupational injury intervention among Wisconsin dairy farmers.

作者信息

Chapman L J, Taveira A D, Josefsson K G, Hard D

机构信息

Department of Biological Systems Engineering, 460 Henry Mall, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

J Agric Saf Health. 2003 Aug;9(3):197-209. doi: 10.13031/2013.13685.

DOI:10.13031/2013.13685
PMID:12970950
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Dairy farming injury rates are high. Previous agricultural research has shown that better information flow can speed adoption of more profitable practices. We conducted and evaluated an intervention to increase voluntary adoption of three production practices that were safer and more profitable than typical practices: barn lights, bag silos, and a mixing site for calf feed.

METHODS

Print mass media, public events, university Extension, and dairy farmers already using the practices were all enlisted to disseminate information to 4,300 northeast district Wisconsin dairy farmers. Evaluation questionnaires were mailed to independent samples of farm managers before (n = 582) and after (n = 572) the 12 month long intervention.

RESULTS

After the intervention, more managers reported getting information about barn lights from public events (12% vs. 23%) and private consultants (8% vs. 17%) and about silo bags from print media (79% vs. 87%) and private consultants (9% vs. 14%). More managers were aware of barn lights (48% vs. 72%) and the calf feed mixing site (44% vs. 56%). There was a nonsignificant tendency for more managers to report adopting barn lights (12% vs. 23%).

CONCLUSIONS

Improving information flow to operation managers about safer, more profitable production practices may be a relatively easy way to supplement conventional injury control efforts in high-hazard industries.

摘要

目标

奶牛养殖的受伤率很高。先前的农业研究表明,更好的信息流通可以加快采用更有利可图的做法。我们开展并评估了一项干预措施,以促使奶农自愿采用三种比传统做法更安全、更有利可图的生产方式:畜舍照明、袋装青贮料和犊牛饲料混合场地。

方法

利用印刷大众媒体、公共活动、大学推广服务以及已经采用这些做法的奶农向威斯康星州东北部地区的4300名奶农传播信息。在为期12个月的干预措施实施之前(n = 582)和之后(n = 572),向农场管理人员的独立样本邮寄了评估问卷。

结果

干预措施实施后,更多的管理人员报告称通过公共活动(从12%增至23%)和私人顾问(从8%增至17%)了解到畜舍照明信息,通过印刷媒体(从79%增至87%)和私人顾问(从9%增至14%)了解到袋装青贮料信息。更多的管理人员知晓畜舍照明(从48%增至72%)和犊牛饲料混合场地(从44%增至56%)。更多管理人员报告采用畜舍照明的趋势不显著(从12%增至23%)。

结论

改善向运营管理人员传递更安全、更有利可图的生产方式的信息,可能是在高风险行业补充传统伤害控制措施的一种相对简便的方法。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an occupational injury intervention among Wisconsin dairy farmers.威斯康星州奶农职业伤害干预措施的评估。
J Agric Saf Health. 2003 Aug;9(3):197-209. doi: 10.13031/2013.13685.
2
Intervention to increase adoption of safer dairy farming production practices.旨在提高更安全奶牛养殖生产实践采用率的干预措施。
Public Health Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug;124 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):125-33. doi: 10.1177/00333549091244S114.
3
A seven-year intervention to diffuse economic innovations with safety benefits to Wisconsin dairy farmers.一项为期七年的向威斯康星州奶农推广具有安全效益的经济创新的干预措施。
J Agric Saf Health. 2013 Jul;19(3):147-62. doi: 10.13031/jash.19.9944.
4
A 4-year intervention to increase adoption of safer dairy farming work practices.一项为期 4 年的干预措施,旨在促进更安全的奶牛养殖工作实践的采用。
Am J Ind Med. 2011 Mar;54(3):232-43. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20920. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
5
The use and value of information systems as evaluated by dairy and specialty crop farm managers.奶业和特色作物农场经理评估的信息系统的使用和价值。
J Agromedicine. 2009;14(3):324-35. doi: 10.1080/10599240903041950.
6
Evaluation of an intervention to reduce musculoskeletal hazards among fresh market vegetable growers.一项针对生鲜市场蔬菜种植者减少肌肉骨骼危害干预措施的评估。
Appl Ergon. 2004 Jan;35(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2003.05.001.
7
Socio-environmental risk factors for medically-attended agricultural injuries in Wisconsin dairy farmers.威斯康星州奶农就医的农业伤害的社会环境风险因素。
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1444-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 May 21.
8
Does multifunctionality matter to US farmers? Farmer motivations and conceptions of multifunctionality in dairy systems.多功能性对美国农民重要吗?奶业系统中农民对多功能性的动机及概念理解
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:451-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
9
Evaluation of a 3year intervention to increase adoption of safer nursery crop production practices.评估一项为期 3 年的干预措施,以增加采用更安全的苗圃作物生产实践。
Appl Ergon. 2010 Jan;41(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 May 6.
10
The health beliefs and skin cancer prevention practices of Wisconsin dairy farmers.威斯康星州奶农的健康观念与皮肤癌预防措施
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 May;22(4):681-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Case History Introducing the Oregon Ag Seminar Series-Keys to Program and Research-to-Practice Success.一个引入俄勒冈农业研讨会系列的病史——项目与研究到实践成功的关键。
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):420-424. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1356777.
2
Intervention to increase adoption of safer dairy farming production practices.旨在提高更安全奶牛养殖生产实践采用率的干预措施。
Public Health Rep. 2009 Jul-Aug;124 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):125-33. doi: 10.1177/00333549091244S114.