• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动向研究参与者反馈结果:儿童肿瘤研究组主要研究者的态度和需求

Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.

作者信息

Fernandez Conrad V, Kodish Eric, Shurin Susan, Weijer Charles

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Sep;25(9):704-8. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200309000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00043426-200309000-00006
PMID:12972805
Abstract

PURPOSE

The offer to return a summary of results to participants after the conclusion of clinical research has many potential benefits. The authors determined current practice and attitudes and needs of researchers in establishing programs to return results to research participants.

METHODS

An Internet survey of all 236 principal investigators (PIs) of the Children's Oncology Group in May 2002 recorded PI and institutional demographics, current practice, and perceived barriers to and needs of PIs for the creation of research results programs.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty (63.8%) PIs responded. Few institutions (n = 5) had established, comprehensive programs to offer the return of results. PIs indicated that major impediments to the implementation of such programs are the preparation of lay summaries, time constraints, the task of contacting participants, and potential distress for the participants. PIs identified the following facilitators to the establishment of a program in their own institution: lay summaries, web site, preparation of an oncologist's summary, and financial credits. There was no clear consensus as to when the results should be shared: 30% indicated after the study was closed and 24% indicated at the time of publication of results. A substantial proportion of respondents opposed or strongly opposed the implementation of a universal offering of results to research participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Few Children's Oncology Group institutions have programs that offer the return of results to research participants. Significant barriers and facilitators to this process have been identified.

摘要

目的

在临床研究结束后向参与者反馈结果总结有诸多潜在益处。作者确定了研究人员在建立向研究参与者反馈结果的项目时的当前做法、态度和需求。

方法

2002年5月对儿童肿瘤研究组的所有236名主要研究者(PI)进行了一项网络调查,记录了PI和机构的人口统计学信息、当前做法以及PI在创建研究结果反馈项目时所感知到的障碍和需求。

结果

150名(63.8%)PI做出了回应。很少有机构(n = 5)建立了全面的项目来提供结果反馈。PI表示实施此类项目的主要障碍包括编写通俗易懂的总结、时间限制、联系参与者的任务以及给参与者带来的潜在困扰。PI确定了在他们自己机构建立项目的以下促进因素:通俗易懂的总结、网站、肿瘤学家总结的编写以及经济奖励。对于何时应分享结果没有明确的共识:30%表示在研究结束后,24%表示在结果发表时。相当一部分受访者反对或强烈反对向研究参与者普遍提供结果。

结论

儿童肿瘤研究组中很少有机构设有向研究参与者反馈结果的项目。已确定了这一过程中的重大障碍和促进因素。

相似文献

1
Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.主动向研究参与者反馈结果:儿童肿瘤研究组主要研究者的态度和需求
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Sep;25(9):704-8. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200309000-00006.
2
Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.向研究参与者和监护人返还研究结果的建议:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4573-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2086. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
3
Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey.研究伦理委员会主席对向参与者披露研究结果的态度:一项全国性调查的结果
J Med Ethics. 2007 Sep;33(9):549-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017129.
4
Expanding disclosure of conflicts of interest: the views of stakeholders.扩大利益冲突的披露范围:利益相关者的观点。
IRB. 2003 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-8.
5
Institutional review board barriers and solutions encountered in the Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now Study: a national multicenter practice-based implementation trial.药剂师与医生合作改善结果研究(“改善结果现在”研究)中遇到的机构审查委员会障碍及解决方案:一项基于全国多中心实践的实施试验
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Sep;33(9):902-11. doi: 10.1002/phar.1276. Epub 2013 May 3.
6
Disclosure of the right of research participants to receive research results: an analysis of consent forms in the Children's Oncology Group.研究参与者获得研究结果权利的披露:儿童肿瘤学组同意书分析
Cancer. 2003 Jun 1;97(11):2904-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11391.
7
Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies.向研究参与者告知研究结果:对加拿大大学研究伦理委员会政策的分析
J Med Ethics. 2006 Jan;32(1):49-54. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.010629.
8
'Ethical responsibility' or 'a whole can of worms': differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members.“道德责任”还是“一团麻烦事”:通过与参与者、家长、机构审查委员会成员、研究人员、医生及社区成员进行焦点小组讨论,了解在神经影像研究中对偶然发现的审查与披露方面的意见分歧
J Med Ethics. 2015 Oct;41(10):841-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102552. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Strategies to Guide the Return of Genomic Research Findings: An Australian Perspective.指导基因组研究结果反馈的策略:澳大利亚视角
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):403-415. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9856-7. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects.一项针对使用认知受损人类研究受试者同意政策的研究人员的调查。
IRB. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):1-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The SHOW RESPECT adaptable framework of considerations for planning how to share trial results with participants, based on qualitative findings from trial participants and site staff.基于试验参与者和现场工作人员的定性发现,为规划如何与参与者共享试验结果而制定的 SHOW RESPECT 可适应考虑框架。
Trials. 2024 Jul 10;25(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08291-7.
2
Parents' Perspectives on Secondary Genetic Ancestry Findings in Pediatric Genomic Medicine.家长对儿科基因组医学中二级遗传祖先检测结果的看法。
Clin Ther. 2023 Aug;45(8):719-728. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
3
Site staff perspectives on communicating trial results to participants: Cost and feasibility results from the Show RESPECT cluster randomised, factorial, mixed-methods trial.
现场工作人员对向参与者传达试验结果的看法:来自 Show RESPECT 集群随机、析因、混合方法试验的成本和可行性结果。
Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;20(6):649-660. doi: 10.1177/17407745231186088. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
4
Engaging participants with research findings: A rights-informed approach.使参与者参与研究结果:一种知情权利的方法。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):765-773. doi: 10.1111/hex.13701. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results.评估研究参与者对接收研究结果的偏好。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 4;4(3):243-249. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.427.
6
First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants.首先,勿施伤害:健康研究人员在与研究参与者分享研究结果方面存在的伦理问题。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Apr-Jun;11(2):104-113. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1737980. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
Characterizing health researcher barriers to sharing results with study participants.描述健康研究人员在与研究参与者分享结果方面所面临的障碍。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 4;3(6):295-301. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.409. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Frequency and format of clinical trial results dissemination to patients: a survey of authors of trials indexed in PubMed.向患者传播临床试验结果的频率和形式:对PubMed索引的试验作者的调查
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 21;9(10):e032701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032701.
9
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.健康研究人员在与参与者分享研究结果方面的经验、看法和障碍。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5.
10
Researchers' experiences with and perceptions of returning results to participants: Study protocol.研究人员向参与者反馈结果的经历与看法:研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Jun 15;11:95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.005. eCollection 2018 Sep.