Suppr超能文献

首先,勿施伤害:健康研究人员在与研究参与者分享研究结果方面存在的伦理问题。

First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants.

作者信息

Purvis Rachel S, Long Christopher R, Eisenberg Leah R, Hester D Micah, Cunningham Thomas V, Holland Angel, Chatrathi Harish E, McElfish Pearl A

机构信息

Office of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.

College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.

出版信息

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Apr-Jun;11(2):104-113. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1737980. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

Abstract

Health researchers and health research participants support the sharing of research results; however, results are typically only shared through peer-reviewed publications. Few studies have investigated researchers' ethical concerns related to sharing results with research participants. An explanatory approach was used to explore the ethical concerns researchers may have with returning aggregate results to research participants. Researchers (N = 414) responded to an online survey of open-ended questions that allowed researchers to provide in-depth explanations regarding their responses to closed-ended questions. Across researchers, the mean percentage of studies for which ethical concerns were reported as a barrier to results sharing was 38.5% (SD= 30.7). Researchers' primary ethical concerns with returning results were articulated as an overarching desire to prevent harm to participants. Three broad ethical concerns emerged, each with underlying subthemes: 1) distress, 2) understanding, and 3) privacy. This is the first study to broadly explore researchers' ethical concerns with sharing aggregate research results with participants and reveals that researchers' ethical concerns are closely tied to the ethical obligation to do no harm. In order to increase results sharing, steps must be taken to help researchers understand how to minimize potential harm when sharing results.

摘要

健康研究人员和健康研究参与者支持研究结果的共享;然而,结果通常仅通过同行评审的出版物进行共享。很少有研究调查研究人员在与研究参与者分享结果方面的伦理问题。本研究采用一种解释性方法来探究研究人员在向研究参与者反馈汇总结果时可能存在的伦理问题。研究人员(N = 414)对一项开放式问题的在线调查做出了回应,该调查允许研究人员就其对封闭式问题的回答提供深入解释。在所有研究人员中,有38.5%(标准差 = 30.7)的研究报告称伦理问题是结果共享的障碍。研究人员在反馈结果时主要的伦理问题表现为防止对参与者造成伤害这一总体愿望。出现了三大伦理问题,每个问题都有潜在的子主题:1)困扰,2)理解,3)隐私。这是第一项广泛探究研究人员在与参与者分享汇总研究结果时的伦理问题的研究,结果表明研究人员的伦理问题与不造成伤害的伦理义务紧密相关。为了增加结果共享,必须采取措施帮助研究人员了解在分享结果时如何将潜在伤害降至最低。

相似文献

1
First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Apr-Jun;11(2):104-113. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1737980. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5.
7
Early-career researchers' views on ethical dimensions of patient engagement in research.
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 7;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0260-y.
8
Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):1-22. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1546241. Epub 2018 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

2
Ethical considerations for sharing aggregate results from pragmatic clinical trials.
Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;22(2):248-254. doi: 10.1177/17407745241290782. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
4
Return of aggregate results to study participants: Facilitators, barriers, and recommendations.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Apr 14;33:101136. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101136. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Rural Research Network to engage rural and minority community members in translational research.
J Clin Transl Res. 2023 Mar 28;9(2):115-122. eCollection 2023 Apr 28.
7
Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness.
Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):211. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020211.

本文引用的文献

1
Health researchers' experiences, perceptions and barriers related to sharing study results with participants.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 4;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0422-5.
2
Researchers' experiences with and perceptions of returning results to participants: Study protocol.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Jun 15;11:95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.005. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):69-74. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1310146. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
4
Reducing therapeutic misconception: A randomized intervention trial in hypothetical clinical trials.
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0184224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184224. eCollection 2017.
5
Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):582-591. doi: 10.1177/1740774516665598. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
6
Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Appl Transl Genom. 2015 Feb 21;4:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2015.02.005. eCollection 2015 Mar.
8
Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.
Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Jul;167(7):1542-50. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37028. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2015 Apr;24(2):231-41. doi: 10.1017/S096318011400053X.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验