Health Research Institute University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Achuta Menon Centre for Health Science Studies SCTIMST, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):765-773. doi: 10.1111/hex.13701. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
Sharing research findings with participants is recognized as an ethical imperative for the research community. However, most discourse on this topic in mainstream public health takes a paternalistic approach, with researchers retaining the power to choose if, when, and how research findings are shared.
Fieldwork took place from August 2018 to January 2019 and again from August 2019 to December 2019 among two communities in the south Indian state of Kerala. We integrated participant engagement with study findings into the research protocol, using various collaborative strategies identified during the design stage, forming partnerships with participants and determining appropriate forms of dissemination for different participant groups during fieldwork.
Findings from previous research projects undertaken with these communities by other researchers had not been shared with them. This was interpreted by the communities as researchers not being interested in making a difference to their situation. In the current study, building reciprocal relationships that minimized power disparities, and providing outputs in tailored formats that promoted active engagement were key factors that enabled participants to engage with results. This engagement added value by enabling us to co-develop study recommendations. This process also enabled the community to have ownership of the results and use them to advocate for health system change to improve access to health care.
Research should be transformative for participating communities. Participants have a right to know the results of the research they participate in since their knowledge provides the research data which can in turn promote community change. Operationalising this requires researchers to build partnerships with participants and their communities from the outset. The role of participants must be reimagined, and adequate resources should be built into the research process. This is both socially responsible and ethical, but also improves the impact and legitimacy of research for the participants and the communities that they represent.
Participants of our research contributed to the design of various aspects of the engagement processes including the venue, the formats used for engagement, interpretation of the findings and recommendations from our research.
与参与者分享研究成果被研究界视为一项道德要求。然而,主流公共卫生领域关于这个话题的大多数论述都采取了家长式的方法,研究人员保留了选择是否、何时以及如何分享研究成果的权力。
实地工作于 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 1 月以及 2019 年 8 月至 2019 年 12 月在印度南部喀拉拉邦的两个社区进行。我们将参与者对研究结果的参与纳入研究方案,使用设计阶段确定的各种合作策略,与参与者建立伙伴关系,并在实地工作期间为不同的参与者群体确定适当的传播形式。
以前由其他研究人员在这些社区进行的研究项目的结果没有与他们分享。社区将这解释为研究人员对改善他们的情况不感兴趣。在当前的研究中,建立最小化权力差距的互惠关系,并提供促进积极参与的定制格式的产出,是使参与者参与研究结果的关键因素。这种参与通过使我们能够共同制定研究建议增加了价值。这个过程还使社区能够拥有研究结果的所有权,并利用这些结果倡导卫生系统变革,以改善获得医疗保健的机会。
研究应该对参与社区具有变革性。参与者有权知道他们参与的研究的结果,因为他们的知识提供了研究数据,这反过来又可以促进社区的变化。要实现这一点,研究人员需要从一开始就与参与者及其社区建立伙伴关系。必须重新构想参与者的角色,并在研究过程中投入足够的资源。这既是对社会负责,也是合乎道德的,而且还可以提高研究对参与者和他们所代表的社区的影响和合法性。
我们研究的参与者为参与过程的各个方面的设计做出了贡献,包括参与的地点、参与使用的格式、研究结果的解释以及我们研究的建议。