Keren Ron, Muret-Wagstaff Sharon, Goldmann Donald A, Mandl Kenneth D
Department of Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003 Aug;19(4):226-30. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000086235.54586.00.
Many emergency departments that perform a high volume of group A Streptococcus throat cultures inform patients or parents that unless they are notified of a positive result they can assume that their throat culture result is negative. Thus, positive throat culture results are communicated actively and negative results are communicated passively. We sought to determine the effectiveness and safety of such a system.
Prospective cohort study of 301 consecutive patients who had group A Streptococcus throat cultures obtained between March 28, 2000, and May 10, 2000, in the emergency department of an urban, academic, tertiary-care children's hospital. Outcomes were determined by telephone surveys of patients or their parents or guardians. The primary outcome was whether respondents had accurate knowledge of the throat culture result. Secondary outcomes included receipt of appropriate treatment instructions, need for another telephone call to the emergency department or primary-care provider to clarify the result or treatment instructions, satisfaction with the communication process, and preference to receive both positive and negative results or just positive results.
Fifty-three percent of respondents did not have accurate knowledge of the throat culture result, 5% received inappropriate treatment instructions, 13% sought further clarification, 29% were dissatisfied with the communication process, and 85% preferred to receive both positive and negative results. Parents of patients with positive results were more likely to have accurate knowledge of the result (odds ratio 6.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-65.7) and to be satisfied with the communication process.
Passive communication of negative throat culture results to patients seen in the emergency department can be unreliable. Active communication of both positive and negative results may improve patient knowledge and satisfaction and ensure appropriate therapy, but in the absence of automated notification systems, would be resource intensive.
许多进行大量A组链球菌咽拭子培养的急诊科告知患者或其家长,除非他们接到阳性结果通知,否则可以认为其咽拭子培养结果为阴性。因此,阳性咽拭子培养结果是主动传达的,而阴性结果是被动传达的。我们试图确定这种系统的有效性和安全性。
对2000年3月28日至2000年5月10日期间在一家城市学术型三级儿童医院急诊科进行A组链球菌咽拭子培养的301例连续患者进行前瞻性队列研究。通过对患者或其家长或监护人的电话调查来确定结果。主要结果是受访者是否对咽拭子培养结果有准确的了解。次要结果包括是否收到适当的治疗指示、是否需要再次致电急诊科或初级保健提供者以澄清结果或治疗指示、对沟通流程的满意度,以及更倾向于同时收到阳性和阴性结果还是仅收到阳性结果。
53%的受访者对咽拭子培养结果没有准确的了解,5%收到了不适当的治疗指示,13%寻求进一步澄清,29%对沟通流程不满意,85%更倾向于同时收到阳性和阴性结果。阳性结果患者的家长更有可能对结果有准确的了解(优势比6.9,95%置信区间1.4 - 65.7),并且对沟通流程感到满意。
向在急诊科就诊的患者被动传达阴性咽拭子培养结果可能不可靠。同时主动传达阳性和阴性结果可能会提高患者的了解程度和满意度,并确保适当的治疗,但在没有自动通知系统的情况下,会耗费大量资源。