Sagi H C, Manos R, Park S-C, Von Jako R, Ordway N R, Connolly P J
University of California San Francisco-Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 1;28(17):E351-4. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000086822.76638.76.
Human cadaveric.
Compare the accuracy of electromagnetic field (EMF)-based image-guided thoracic pedicle screw insertion to conventional techniques using anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopy.
Image-guided surgical systems that aid in spinal instrumentation seek to minimize radiation exposure and improve accuracy. EMF image guidance was developed as an alternative to optical tracking to eliminate potential line of sight issues.
Four fresh-frozen human cadavers were randomly allocated into two groups. Pedicle screws were inserted from T1 to T12 using anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopy in group 1 and image guidance in group 2. Insertion and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Anatomic dissections were performed to assess screw placement.
Image guidance placed 92% of thoracic pedicle screws safely, and conventional fluoroscopy placed 90% safely. The average degree of perforation was 2.4 mm with conventional fluoroscopy and 1.7 mm with image guidance (P = 0.055). Fluoroscopic time per screw was 5.9 seconds for conventional fluoroscopy and 3.6 seconds for image guidance (P = 0.045). Insertion time per screw was 4.35 minutes for conventional fluoroscopy and 2.98 minutes for image guidance (P = 0.007). However, when set-up time and image capture time were taken into account, the total insertion time per screw was not significantly different between the two groups.
Our study has shown that EMF image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement results in a similar incidence of safely placed screws as does conventional fluoroscopy. When set-up time and image-capture time were factored in for image guidance, the average time to insert a pedicle screw was equal for both techniques. The use of EMF image guidance significantly reduced fluoroscopic time and thus radiation exposure per screw compared with conventional fluoroscopic techniques.
人体尸体研究。
比较基于电磁场(EMF)的图像引导下胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入术与使用解剖标志和荧光透视的传统技术的准确性。
有助于脊柱内固定的图像引导手术系统旨在尽量减少辐射暴露并提高准确性。EMF图像引导技术是作为光学跟踪的替代方法而开发的,以消除潜在的视线问题。
将四具新鲜冷冻的人体尸体随机分为两组。第1组使用解剖标志和荧光透视从T1至T12置入椎弓根螺钉,第2组使用图像引导。记录置入时间和荧光透视时间。进行解剖以评估螺钉位置。
图像引导下92%的胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入安全,传统荧光透视下为90%。传统荧光透视下平均穿孔程度为2.4毫米,图像引导下为1.7毫米(P = 0.055)。每颗螺钉的荧光透视时间,传统荧光透视为5.9秒,图像引导为3.6秒(P = 0.045)。每颗螺钉的置入时间,传统荧光透视为4.35分钟,图像引导为2.98分钟(P = 0.007)。然而,当考虑设置时间和图像采集时间时,两组之间每颗螺钉的总置入时间无显著差异。
我们的研究表明,EMF图像引导下的胸椎椎弓根螺钉置入术与传统荧光透视术安全置入螺钉的发生率相似。当考虑图像引导的设置时间和图像采集时间时,两种技术置入椎弓根螺钉的平均时间相等。与传统荧光透视技术相比,使用EMF图像引导显著减少了荧光透视时间,从而减少了每颗螺钉的辐射暴露。