Leone Marc, Albanese Jacques, Antonini François, Nguyen-Michel Annie, Martin Claude
Intensive Care Unit and Trsuma Center, Hospital Nord, Marseilles University Hospital System, Marseilles School of Medicine, France.
Crit Care Med. 2003 Aug;31(8):2090-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000079606.16776.C5.
To determine whether selective digestive decontamination (SDD) had some negative impact on the bacterial resistance observed in strains isolated from samples from patients receiving nonabsorbable antibiotics and cefazolin.
Case-control study.
Intensive care unit of a university tertiary-care hospital.
Over a 6-yr period, 360 multiple trauma patients (case patients) submitted to SDD were compared with 360 patients not receiving SDD (controls).
SDD consisted of polymyxin E, gentamicin, and amphotericin B and was applied on the buccal mucosa and provided in the nares and the stomach. For the first 3 days, systemic cefazolin (1 g three times a day) was provided. Resistance analysis was performed in case patients and controls on samples collected at predetermined intervals.
SDD was used in a small subset of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (360 of 5987 over the 6-yr study period). A relative overgrowth of gram-positive cocci was observed. Methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus epidermidis was increased (SDD 76%, controls 63%, p <.05) but not that of Staphylococcus aureus (SDD 20%, controls 18%). Resistance of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter to beta-lactamines and aminoglycosides was the same in SDD patients and controls.
When used in a small subset of patients who have been shown to derive benefit from it (patients who have experienced multiple trauma), SDD has a moderate impact on microbial ecology. However, surveillance cultures are indispensable because the absence of resistance to SDD antibiotics determines the long-term safety of the SDD prophylaxis.
确定选择性消化道去污(SDD)对从接受非吸收性抗生素和头孢唑林治疗的患者样本中分离出的菌株的细菌耐药性是否有负面影响。
病例对照研究。
一所大学三级护理医院的重症监护病房。
在6年期间,将360例接受SDD的多发伤患者(病例组)与360例未接受SDD的患者(对照组)进行比较。
SDD由多粘菌素E、庆大霉素和两性霉素B组成,应用于颊黏膜,并经鼻腔和胃给药。头3天给予全身性头孢唑林(每日3次,每次1 g)。对病例组和对照组在预定时间采集的样本进行耐药性分析。
在重症监护病房收治的一小部分患者中使用了SDD(6年研究期间5987例患者中的360例)。观察到革兰氏阳性球菌相对过度生长。表皮葡萄球菌的耐甲氧西林性增加(SDD组为76%,对照组为63%,p<0.05),但金黄色葡萄球菌的耐甲氧西林性未增加(SDD组为20%,对照组为18%)。肠杆菌科、铜绿假单胞菌和不动杆菌对β-内酰胺类和氨基糖苷类的耐药性在SDD组患者和对照组中相同。
当在一小部分已证明从中获益的患者(多发伤患者)中使用时,SDD对微生物生态有中度影响。然而,监测培养是必不可少的,因为对SDD抗生素无耐药性决定了SDD预防的长期安全性。