Petersen J S, Bregenholt S, Apostolopolous V, Homann D, Wolfe T, Hughes A, De Jongh K, Wang M, Dyrberg T, Von Herrath M G
La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2003 Oct;134(1):38-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02255.x.
Our earlier investigations have demonstrated a critical difference in the efficacy of orally administered porcine compared to human or mouse insulin (no effect) in preventing type I diabetes in two distinct experimental models. Based on these findings one has to assume that certain insulins might not be suitable for the induction of oral 'tolerance'/bystander suppression, which might be one cause for recent failures in human oral antigen trials. Here we demonstrate that coupling to the non-toxic subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) can abolish these differences in efficacy between human and porcine insulin. As expected, an added benefit was the much smaller oral antigen dose required to induce CD4+ insulin-B specific regulatory cells that bystander-suppress autoaggressive responses. Mechanistically we found that uptake or transport of insulin-CTB conjugates in the gut occurs at least partially via binding to GM-1, which would explain the enhanced clinical efficacy. Both B chains bound well to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, indicating comparable immunological potential once uptake and processing has occurred. Thus, our findings delineate a pathway to overcome issues in oral antigen choice for prevention of type I diabetes.
我们早期的研究表明,在两种不同的实验模型中,口服猪胰岛素与人类或小鼠胰岛素(无效果)在预防I型糖尿病方面的疗效存在关键差异。基于这些发现,人们不得不假设某些胰岛素可能不适用于诱导口服“耐受性”/旁观者抑制,这可能是近期人类口服抗原试验失败的一个原因。在此,我们证明与霍乱毒素(CTB)的无毒亚基偶联可以消除人类和猪胰岛素在疗效上的这些差异。正如预期的那样,一个额外的好处是诱导CD4 +胰岛素B特异性调节细胞以旁观者方式抑制自身攻击性反应所需的口服抗原剂量要小得多。从机制上讲,我们发现胰岛素 - CTB缀合物在肠道中的摄取或转运至少部分是通过与GM - 1结合发生的,这可以解释其增强的临床疗效。两条B链都能很好地与主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)II类结合,表明一旦发生摄取和加工,它们具有相当的免疫潜力。因此,我们的研究结果描绘了一条克服预防I型糖尿病口服抗原选择问题的途径。