• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用牙周韧带注射的麻醉持续时间:布比卡因与利多卡因的比较。

Duration of anesthesia using the periodontal ligament injection: a comparison of bupivacaine to lidocaine.

作者信息

McLean M E, Wayman B E, Mayhew R B

机构信息

Langley Air Force Base, Virginia 23665-5300.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Control Dent. 1992 Fall;1(4):207-13.

PMID:1298487
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the duration of pulpal anesthesia obtained with 0.5% bupivacaine HCl with 1:200,000 epinephrine to 2% lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine, using the periodontal ligament (PDL) injection. Twenty-four subjects received bilateral PDL injections using mandibular premolar teeth and a double-blind research design. Anesthesia was defined as no response to maximum output of an electric pulp tester. An overall success rate of 35.4% was achieved. Duration of anesthesia obtained with bupivacaine HCl ranged from 4 minutes 59 seconds to 16 minutes 37 seconds with a mean duration of 10 minutes 24 seconds. Excluding one instance in which the duration was three orders of magnitude beyond the norm, duration of anesthesia obtained with lidocaine HCl ranged from 1 minute 43 seconds to 16 minutes 16 seconds with a mean duration of 7 minutes 10 seconds. Postoperatively, all experimental teeth tested vital with no clinically apparent pulpal or periodontal damage. Some postoperative discomfort was experienced at 16.6% of the injection sites.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用牙周韧带(PDL)注射法,比较0.5%盐酸布比卡因加1:200,000肾上腺素与2%盐酸利多卡因加1:100,000肾上腺素获得牙髓麻醉的持续时间。24名受试者使用下颌前磨牙接受双侧PDL注射,并采用双盲研究设计。麻醉定义为对牙髓电测器的最大输出无反应。总体成功率为35.4%。盐酸布比卡因获得的麻醉持续时间为4分59秒至16分37秒,平均持续时间为10分24秒。排除一次持续时间比正常情况超出三个数量级的情况后,盐酸利多卡因获得的麻醉持续时间为1分43秒至16分16秒,平均持续时间为7分10秒。术后,所有受试牙齿测试均显示活力正常,无明显的牙髓或牙周损伤临床症状。16.6%的注射部位出现了一些术后不适。

相似文献

1
Duration of anesthesia using the periodontal ligament injection: a comparison of bupivacaine to lidocaine.使用牙周韧带注射的麻醉持续时间:布比卡因与利多卡因的比较。
Anesth Pain Control Dent. 1992 Fall;1(4):207-13.
2
Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.使用计算机控制局部麻醉药输送系统进行初次韧带内注射时阿替卡因和利多卡因的疗效。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Mar;99(3):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.11.009.
3
Anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine in maxillary anterior infiltration.罗哌卡因在上颌前部浸润麻醉中的效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Apr;91(4):406-12. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.114000.
4
Anesthetic efficacy of infiltrations in mandibular anterior teeth.下颌前牙浸润麻醉的效果
Anesth Prog. 2001 Spring;48(2):55-60.
5
A comparison of the periodontal ligament injection using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and saline in human mandibular premolars.在下颌前磨牙中使用含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因与生理盐水进行牙周膜注射的比较。
Anesth Prog. 1987 Sep-Oct;34(5):181-6.
6
A comparison of periodontal intraligamental anesthesia using etidocaine HCl and lidocaine HCl.使用盐酸依替卡因和盐酸利多卡因进行牙周韧带内麻醉的比较。
Anesth Prog. 1985 Sep-Oct;32(5):202-5.
7
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.布比卡因与利多卡因用于上颌浸润麻醉的前瞻性、随机、双盲对照研究。
J Endod. 2007 Sep;33(9):1021-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.003.
8
Anesthetic efficacy of an infiltration in mandibular anterior teeth following an inferior alveolar nerve block.下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉后下颌前牙浸润麻醉的效果
Anesth Prog. 2002 Spring;49(2):49-55.
9
Comparison of postoperative bupivacaine with lidocaine on pain and analgesic use following periodontal surgery.牙周手术后布比卡因与利多卡因对疼痛及镇痛药物使用情况的比较。
J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr. 1997;45(1):5-8.
10
Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration.阿替卡因和利多卡因对上颌浸润麻醉的起效时间和持续时间。
Quintessence Int. 2005 Mar;36(3):197-201.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 1% Chloroprocaine Vis-a-vis 2% Lignocaine with Adrenaline (1:80,000) in Third Molar Surgery.1%氯普鲁卡因与含肾上腺素(1:80,000)的2%利多卡因在第三磨牙手术中麻醉效果的比较评估。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Oct;23(5):1261-1266. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01989-2. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
2
Anesthetic efficacy of primary and supplemental buccal/lingual infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis in human mandibular molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis.人类下颌磨牙不可逆性牙髓炎患者中初次及补充性颊/舌侧浸润麻醉的效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Aug;21(4):283-309. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.4.283. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
3
Anesthetic success of supplemental infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: A systematic review.
下颌磨牙不可逆性牙髓炎补充浸润麻醉的成功率:一项系统评价。
J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):182-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.157238.
4
Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.使用计算机控制局部麻醉药输送系统进行初次韧带内注射时,阿替卡因和利多卡因的注射疼痛、心率增加及注射后疼痛的比较。
Anesth Prog. 2004;51(4):126-33.
5
Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry.牙科疼痛与焦虑控制的科学文献综述。
Anesth Prog. 1993;40(2):46-54.