Costa Carina Gisele, Tortamano Isabel Peixoto, Rocha Rodney Garcia, Francischone Carlos Eduardo, Tortamano Nicolau
Department of Integrated Clinic and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Uningá University, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Quintessence Int. 2005 Mar;36(3):197-201.
The aim of this study was to compare the onset and duration of pulpal anesthesia by maxillary infiltration using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
Twenty healthy patients randomly received 1.8 mL of one of the three local anesthetics during operative dentistry procedures of low complexity on three maxillary posterior teeth. Onset and duration were determined using an electric pulp tester.
The mean values for pulpal onset were 2.8, 1.6, and 1.4 minutes and for pulpal duration were 39.2, 56.7, and 66.3 minutes, respectively, for 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Statistical analysis by the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test showed significant differences with better results (shorter onset and longer duration periods) for both articaine solutions compared with the lidocaine solution. Although 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine clinically presented the shortest onset and the longest duration periods, there was no statistically significant difference between the articaine solutions.
Both articaine solutions produced shorter onset and longer duration of pulpal anesthesia by maxillary infiltration than the lidocaine solution did. Statistical analysis did not confirm better clinical results of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine than with 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine.
本研究旨在比较使用含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因、含1:200,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因以及含1:100,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因进行上颌浸润麻醉时牙髓麻醉的起效时间和持续时间。
20名健康患者在对三颗上颌后牙进行低复杂性口腔手术操作期间,随机接受三种局部麻醉剂中的一种,剂量为1.8毫升。使用牙髓电活力测试仪确定起效时间和持续时间。
含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因、含1:200,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因以及含1:100,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因的牙髓麻醉起效时间平均值分别为2.8分钟、1.6分钟和1.4分钟,持续时间平均值分别为39.2分钟、56.7分钟和66.3分钟。通过Kruskal-Wallis非参数检验进行的统计分析表明,与利多卡因溶液相比,两种阿替卡因溶液的效果更佳(起效时间更短且持续时间更长),差异具有统计学意义。尽管含1:100,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因在临床上表现出最短的起效时间和最长的持续时间,但两种阿替卡因溶液之间无统计学显著差异。
两种阿替卡因溶液在上颌浸润麻醉时产生的牙髓麻醉起效时间比利多卡因溶液更短,持续时间更长。统计分析未证实含1:100,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因比含1:200,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因具有更好的临床效果。