Sorbara L, Fonn D, MacNeill K
Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Dec;69(12):953-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199212000-00008.
The flexure of spherical rigid lenses (various materials) and a soft lens was measured using automated over-keratometry on 6 adapted rigid lens wearers (12 eyes) whose corneal toricity ranged from 1.37 to 3.87 D. The results showed: (1) that there was no significant difference in flexure between polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), silicone acrylate, and the fluorosilicone acrylate lenses (whose Dks ranged from 0 to 115). However, Advent (fluoropolymer) did flex significantly more than the other rigid lenses, and significantly less than the soft lens (Bausch & Lomb U4) and (2) that lens flexure of the rigid lenses did not alter over a 2-h period. We also measured high and low contrast visual acuity (HCVA and LCVA), and the results from subjects wearing Advent and the soft lens were significantly worse than with the other rigid lenses. Finally, the results of this study showed no correlation between rigid lens flexure and permeability and between rigid lens flexure and visual acuity when Advent was excluded from the linear regression analysis.
使用自动角膜曲率计对6名适应佩戴硬性镜片的受试者(12只眼)进行测量,这些受试者角膜散光范围为1.37至3.87 D,测量了不同材料的球形硬性镜片和软性镜片的弯曲度。结果显示:(1)聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)、硅丙烯酸酯和氟硅丙烯酸酯镜片(其Dks范围为0至115)之间的弯曲度无显著差异。然而,Advent(含氟聚合物)的弯曲度明显大于其他硬性镜片,且明显小于软性镜片(博士伦U4);(2)硬性镜片的弯曲度在2小时内未发生变化。我们还测量了高对比度和低对比度视力(HCVA和LCVA),佩戴Advent和软性镜片的受试者的结果明显比其他硬性镜片差。最后,本研究结果表明,在排除Advent进行线性回归分析时,硬性镜片的弯曲度与通透性之间以及硬性镜片的弯曲度与视力之间均无相关性。