Pham D T, Wollensak J, Drosch S
Universitäts-Augenklinik, Klinikum Rudolf Virchow, Freie Universität Berlin.
Ophthalmologe. 1992 Aug;89(4):305-9.
We compared two suture techniques after phacoemulsification and implantation of a standard PMMA posterior chamber lens with a 7 mm intrascleral lamellar incision: the cross-stitch (double running) suture closure and the one-stitch technique. Two series with 100 patients each were examined. In the early postoperative period the astigmatism induced was 1.9 +/- 1.4 D in the cross-stitch group and 1.5 +/- 1.0 in the one-stitch group (P = 0.01). In the latter group, 20% more of the patients were found to have a moderate amount of astigmatism. Four weeks after surgery, however, there were no differences between the two groups. The induced astigmatism in both groups was 1.0 D.
我们比较了在白内障超声乳化吸除术及植入一枚标准的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)后房型人工晶状体并采用7mm巩膜层间切口后,两种缝合技术的效果:十字缝合法(双连续)缝合关闭及单针法。对两个系列各100例患者进行了检查。术后早期,十字缝合组诱导的散光为1.9±1.4D,单针组为1.5±1.0D(P=0.01)。在后一组中,发现有中度散光的患者多20%。然而,术后四周时,两组之间没有差异。两组诱导的散光均为1.0D。