Suppr超能文献

青光眼患者使用Peritest半自动视野计进行单刺激和多刺激视野检查的差异。

Discrepancies between single stimulus and multiple stimulus visual field examinations with the Peritest semi-automated perimeter in glaucoma patients.

作者信息

Langerhorst C T, Bakker D, Felius J, van den Berg T J

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Amsterdam.

出版信息

Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;82(1-2):135-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00157003.

Abstract

In a total of 24 randomly selected eyes of glaucoma patients, tested with the automated (single stimulus) and the manual (multiple stimulus) modes of the semi-automated Peritest perimeter, the numbers and depths of defects were compared as estimated with these two different measurement strategies. It was found that with the manual technique considerably less defects were detected than with the automated strategy.

摘要

在总共24只随机选取的青光眼患者眼睛中,使用半自动Peritest视野计的自动(单刺激)和手动(多刺激)模式进行测试,比较了用这两种不同测量策略估计的缺损数量和深度。结果发现,与自动策略相比,手动技术检测到的缺损要少得多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验