Langerhorst C T, Bakker D, Felius J, van den Berg T J
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Amsterdam.
Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;82(1-2):135-40. doi: 10.1007/BF00157003.
In a total of 24 randomly selected eyes of glaucoma patients, tested with the automated (single stimulus) and the manual (multiple stimulus) modes of the semi-automated Peritest perimeter, the numbers and depths of defects were compared as estimated with these two different measurement strategies. It was found that with the manual technique considerably less defects were detected than with the automated strategy.
在总共24只随机选取的青光眼患者眼睛中，使用半自动Peritest视野计的自动（单刺激）和手动（多刺激）模式进行测试，比较了用这两种不同测量策略估计的缺损数量和深度。结果发现，与自动策略相比，手动技术检测到的缺损要少得多。
