Suppr超能文献

强直性脊柱炎患者管理中疲劳的评估

Assessment of fatigue in the management of patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

作者信息

Dernis-Labous E, Messow M, Dougados M

机构信息

René Descartes University, AP-HP Cochin Hospital, Rheumatology B Department, Paris, France.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Dec;42(12):1523-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg421. Epub 2003 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain, stiffness, functional impairment, range of motion and quality of life are the main conventional domains used in studies evaluating ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, fatigue has been reported as the major complaint of AS patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate fatigue as a potential independent domain in comparison with the 'conventional' ones and to evaluate the sensitivity to change after non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy.

METHODS

Patients were classified as having painful AS (modified New York criteria). The following variables were recorded at baseline and after 6 weeks of therapy (either placebo or NSAIDs): pain (VAS), function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index), patient's global assessment (VAS), inflammation (night pain), morning stiffness, metrology (Schober test, finger-to-floor) and fatigue using 0-100 VAS scale. Analysis consisted of (i) the prevalence of fatigue (VAS value of at least 50 mm), (ii) the independence of the information evaluated using a regression model, and (iii) the sensitivity to change, by calculating the standardized response mean (mean change/s.d. change) (SRM) between placebo and NSAID group.

RESULTS

Fatigue was considered important in 401 patients (out of 639: 63%). The information provided by the variables 'pain', 'function' and 'global assessment' explained only 44% of the variability of the variable 'fatigue' (similar analyses considering 'pain' on the one hand and 'function' on the other hand as the dependent variables showed an R2 value of 34 and 60%, respectively). The NSAID treatment effect (SRM) was higher for the variables 'pain' and 'function' (0.76 and 0.71, respectively) than for the variable 'fatigue' (0.34).

CONCLUSION

This study strongly suggests that fatigue should be considered as an independent domain to be systematically evaluated in AS patients and that conventional therapy such as NSAIDs have a lower effect on this domain than on pain or functional impairment.

摘要

背景

疼痛、僵硬、功能障碍、活动范围和生活质量是评估强直性脊柱炎(AS)的研究中常用的主要传统领域。然而,疲劳已被报告为AS患者的主要主诉。

目的

将疲劳作为一个潜在的独立领域与“传统”领域进行比较评估,并评估非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)治疗后疲劳对变化的敏感性。

方法

患者根据改良纽约标准被分类为疼痛性AS。在基线和治疗6周后(安慰剂或NSAIDs)记录以下变量:疼痛(视觉模拟评分法[VAS])、功能(巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数)、患者整体评估(VAS)、炎症(夜间疼痛)、晨僵、测量(Schober试验、手指触地距离)以及使用0 - 100 VAS量表评估的疲劳。分析包括:(i)疲劳的患病率(VAS值至少为50 mm),(ii)使用回归模型评估信息的独立性,以及(iii)通过计算安慰剂组和NSAID组之间的标准化反应均值(平均变化/标准差变化)(SRM)来评估对变化的敏感性。

结果

401例患者(639例中的63%)认为疲劳很重要。变量“疼痛”、“功能”和“整体评估”所提供的信息仅解释了变量“疲劳”变异性的44%(将“疼痛”和“功能”分别作为因变量进行的类似分析显示R²值分别为34%和60%)。NSAID治疗效果(SRM)对于变量“疼痛”和“功能”(分别为0.76和0.71)高于变量“疲劳”(0.34)。

结论

本研究强烈表明,应将疲劳视为AS患者中需系统评估的一个独立领域,并且NSAIDs等传统疗法对该领域的影响低于对疼痛或功能障碍的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验