de Lassence A, Lecossier D, Pierre C, Cadranel J, Stern M, Hance A J
INSERM U 82, Faculté de Médecine Xavier Bichat, Paris, France.
Thorax. 1992 Apr;47(4):265-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.4.265.
The detection of mycobacterial DNA in clinical samples on the basis of the polymerase chain reaction is a promising approach for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculous infections. No consensus exists, however, about which protocols are most sensitive, and the usefulness of this approach in the diagnosis of tuberculous effusions has been assessed in few patients.
The sensitivity of two protocols was compared for the detection of DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in samples containing known amounts of mycobacterial DNA and in DNA extracted from 15 tuberculous pleural effusions. The results obtained for pleural fluid have been compared with cytological findings and with results obtained by standard microbiological techniques.
Mycobacteria could be detected by acid fast staining in none and by culture in three of the 15 pleural fluid samples. A protocol based on the detection of the IS6110 insertion element (which could detect one mycobacterial genome/sample reproducibly) gave a positive result in nine of the 15 tuberculous effusions, though some samples were only intermittently positive (p less than 0.05 compared with culture). In contrast, a protocol based on the detection of the gene coding for the 65 kD mycobacterial antigen (which could detect mycobacterial genomes only if there were at least 10/sample) gave a positive result in three of the 15 tuberculous effusions. Pleural fluid that was always positive with the amplification procedure detecting the IS6110 sequence contained more neutrophils (30% (SD 27%)) than samples that were intermittently positive or always negative (3% (3%)); mycobacterial DNA was never detected in the four samples containing less than 1% neutrophils.
The amplification of the IS6110 insertion element represents a rapid and sensitive means of detecting M tuberculosis in tuberculous effusions. The enrichment of cells containing mycobacteria (possibly neutrophils) before DNA extraction may be required to improve the sensitivity of this approach.
基于聚合酶链反应检测临床样本中的分枝杆菌DNA是快速诊断结核感染的一种很有前景的方法。然而,对于哪种方案最敏感尚无共识,且该方法在结核性胸腔积液诊断中的实用性仅在少数患者中进行了评估。
比较了两种方案检测含已知量分枝杆菌DNA样本以及从15例结核性胸腔积液中提取的DNA中结核分枝杆菌DNA的敏感性。将胸腔积液的检测结果与细胞学检查结果以及标准微生物学技术的结果进行了比较。
15份胸腔积液样本中,无一例通过抗酸染色检测到分枝杆菌,3例通过培养检测到分枝杆菌。基于检测IS6110插入元件的方案(可重复检测到每个样本一个分枝杆菌基因组)在15例结核性胸腔积液中有9例呈阳性结果,尽管一些样本仅为间歇性阳性(与培养相比,P<0.05)。相比之下,基于检测编码65kD分枝杆菌抗原的基因的方案(只有当每个样本至少有10个基因组时才能检测到分枝杆菌基因组)在15例结核性胸腔积液中有3例呈阳性结果。通过检测IS6110序列的扩增程序始终呈阳性的胸腔积液中中性粒细胞含量(30%(标准差27%))高于间歇性阳性或始终阴性的样本(3%(3%));在4份中性粒细胞含量低于1%的样本中从未检测到分枝杆菌DNA。
IS6110插入元件的扩增是检测结核性胸腔积液中结核分枝杆菌的一种快速且敏感的方法。可能需要在DNA提取前富集含分枝杆菌的细胞(可能为中性粒细胞)以提高该方法的敏感性。