Wongwatcharadumrong R, Kunavongkrit A, Neumüller M, Linné T
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1992 Mar;39(2):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1992.tb01142.x.
Virus isolation, immunofluorescent staining and DNA probe hybridization, three techniques for the detection of pseudorabies virus (PRV) have been compared in pigs experimentally infected with the Thailand CB-1 strain PRV. The virus isolation and DNA hybridization detection demonstrated a good correlation in detecting infection in live animals by nasal swabbing. In white blood cells an earlier detection was seen with the DNA-hybridization techniques. Consistent results with all the three techniques tested were found in organ materials as nasal mucosa and tonsils as well as in the olfactory bulb.
在实验感染泰国CB - 1株伪狂犬病病毒(PRV)的猪身上,对病毒分离、免疫荧光染色和DNA探针杂交这三种检测伪狂犬病病毒(PRV)的技术进行了比较。病毒分离和DNA杂交检测在通过鼻拭子检测活体动物感染方面显示出良好的相关性。在白细胞中,DNA杂交技术能更早地检测到病毒。在鼻黏膜、扁桃体以及嗅球等器官材料中,所测试的这三种技术都得到了一致的结果。