Pan H B, Chiang J H, Huang J S, Chang J M, Yang C F, Lai K H, Mok J T
Department of Radiology, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1992 Aug;50(2):142-8.
Ninety-eight cases of surgically proved bowel perforation in VGH-Kaohsiung within one year were reviewed. Among them, 25 patients received abdominal CT scans before operation. Free gas or fluid could be demonstrated with CT scan in 80% of cases though sometimes the fluid was too scanty to be well recognized. Local abscess formation with or without tumor mass lesion (n = 3), local fluid accumulation (n = 1) and negative CT findings (n = 1) constituted the remaining 20% of cases. The recognition of perforation sites depended on direct evidences of perforation such as ulceration, abscess formation and tumor mass lesion (32%), or indirect evidences including hematoma formation, dependent extraluminal gas accumulation and phlegmonous reaction (12%). An inexplicable localized extraluminal fluid accumulation might also suggest a possibility of hollow organ perforation and lead to the recognition of perforation site in the absence of free gas (4%). Absence of extraluminal fluid or gas can not completely rule out the possibility of hollow organ perforation (4%). Massive free air, especially with an air-fluid level, suggested a possibility of upper abdominal perforation. The perforation hole located at the anterior wall of stomach produced more free gas than that located at posterior wall. Air-fluid levels could never be identified in the cases of lower gastrointestinal perforations. Local bowel wall thickening and the distribution of free gas contributed little to the recognition of perforation site. Extravasation of oral contrast media sometimes led to the diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation but was not necessary to be noted around the perforation hole and did little contribution to the perforation site recognition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
回顾了高雄长庚医院一年内经手术证实的98例肠穿孔病例。其中,25例患者在手术前接受了腹部CT扫描。80%的病例CT扫描可显示游离气体或液体,不过有时液体量太少难以清晰识别。其余20%的病例包括伴有或不伴有肿瘤块病变的局部脓肿形成(n = 3)、局部液体聚集(n = 1)以及CT检查结果阴性(n = 1)。穿孔部位的识别取决于穿孔的直接证据,如溃疡、脓肿形成和肿瘤块病变(32%),或间接证据,包括血肿形成、依赖的腔外气体积聚和蜂窝织炎反应(12%)。无法解释的局限性腔外液体聚集也可能提示中空器官穿孔的可能性,并在无游离气体的情况下导致穿孔部位的识别(4%)。腔外无液体或气体并不能完全排除中空器官穿孔的可能性(4%)。大量游离气体,尤其是伴有气液平面,提示上腹部穿孔的可能性。位于胃前壁的穿孔孔产生的游离气体比位于后壁的更多。在下消化道穿孔病例中从未发现气液平面。局部肠壁增厚和游离气体的分布对穿孔部位的识别贡献不大。口服造影剂外渗有时可导致胃肠道穿孔的诊断,但不必在穿孔孔周围观察到,对穿孔部位的识别贡献也不大。(摘要截选至250字)