• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:轻度至中度心力衰竭患者每日一次赖诺普利与每日两次卡托普利的比较

Long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: once-daily lisinopril versus twice-daily captopril in mild-to-moderate heart failure.

作者信息

Bach R, Zardini P

机构信息

Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Innere Medizin III, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 8;70(10):70C-77C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91361-7.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(92)91361-7
PMID:1329477
Abstract

Once-daily lisinopril (5-20 mg) was compared with twice-daily captopril (12.5-50 mg) in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition conducted in 31 centers for 12 weeks in patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association class II-III) who were currently receiving digitalis and/or diuretics. The drugs were compared with regard to their effects on exercise duration, measured with bicycle ergometry, and on ectopic activity, measured using Holter monitoring. Both drugs significantly increased exercise duration after both 6 and 12 weeks of randomized treatment. Neither ACE inhibitor had any significant impact on the hourly rate of either ventricular ectopic counts or couplets, nor was there any difference between treatments with regard to the proportions of patients in whom ventricular ectopic counts were reduced. Both drugs were well tolerated, with no differences observed between treatments. Potassium, urea, and creatinine levels remained stable for both treatments throughout the study.

摘要

在一项双盲、随机、平行组研究中,将每日一次的赖诺普利(5 - 20毫克)与每日两次的卡托普利(12.5 - 50毫克)进行了比较,该研究为血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制研究,在31个中心开展,为期12周,研究对象为患有心力衰竭(纽约心脏协会II - III级)且正在接受洋地黄和/或利尿剂治疗的患者。比较了这两种药物对通过自行车测力计测量的运动持续时间以及通过动态心电图监测测量的异位活动的影响。在随机治疗6周和12周后,两种药物均显著增加了运动持续时间。两种ACE抑制剂对每小时室性异位搏动计数或成对搏动率均无显著影响,在室性异位搏动计数减少的患者比例方面,治疗组之间也没有差异。两种药物耐受性良好,治疗组之间未观察到差异。在整个研究过程中,两种治疗的钾、尿素和肌酐水平均保持稳定。

相似文献

1
Long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: once-daily lisinopril versus twice-daily captopril in mild-to-moderate heart failure.长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:轻度至中度心力衰竭患者每日一次赖诺普利与每日两次卡托普利的比较
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 8;70(10):70C-77C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91361-7.
2
Comparison of lisinopril versus digoxin for congestive heart failure during maintenance diuretic therapy. The Lisinopril-Digoxin Study Group.
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 8;70(10):84C-90C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91363-9.
3
Comparison of treatment with lisinopril versus enalapril for congestive heart failure.
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 8;70(10):78C-83C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91362-8.
4
Lisinopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure in elderly patients: comparison versus captopril.赖诺普利治疗老年充血性心力衰竭:与卡托普利的比较
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1997 Mar;11(1):63-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007704024393.
5
Short- and long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomized trial of lisinopril versus captopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure. The Multicenter Lisinopril-Captopril Congestive Heart Failure Study Group.短效和长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:赖诺普利与卡托普利治疗充血性心力衰竭的随机试验。多中心赖诺普利-卡托普利充血性心力衰竭研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 May;13(6):1240-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90294-5.
6
Comparison of the first-dose effect of captopril and lisinopril in heart failure.卡托普利和赖诺普利对心力衰竭首剂效应的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 8;70(10):137C-139C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91373-c.
7
Lisinopril and captopril in the treatment of heart failure in older patients. Comparison of a long- and short-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.赖诺普利和卡托普利治疗老年患者心力衰竭。长效与短效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的比较。
Am J Med. 1988 Sep 23;85(3B):44-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90350-6.
8
Effect of captopril and lisinopril on circadian blood pressure rhythm and renal function in mild-to-moderate heart failure.卡托普利和赖诺普利对轻至中度心力衰竭患者昼夜血压节律及肾功能的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 8;70(10):147C-150C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91377-g.
9
Randomised, double-blind crossover comparison of once-daily captopril and lisinopril in patients with mild to moderate hypertension--a community-based study. Hunter Hypertension Research Group.轻度至中度高血压患者每日一次服用卡托普利和赖诺普利的随机双盲交叉对照研究——一项基于社区的研究。亨特高血压研究小组
Clin Exp Hypertens. 1993 Mar;15(2):423-34. doi: 10.3109/10641969309032944.
10
Lisinopril in the treatment of congestive heart failure.赖诺普利治疗充血性心力衰竭
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:83-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Different ACE Inhibitors in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: A PRISMA-Compliant Network Meta-Analysis.不同血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗慢性心力衰竭患者的疗效与安全性比较:一项符合PRISMA标准的网状Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(6):e2554. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002554.
2
Effect of different angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors on mortality among elderly patients with congestive heart failure.不同血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对老年充血性心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响。
CMAJ. 2008 May 6;178(10):1303-11. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060068.
3
Lisinopril: a review of its use in congestive heart failure.
赖诺普利:其在充血性心力衰竭中应用的综述
Drugs. 2000 May;59(5):1149-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059050-00012.
4
Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in elderly patients.赖诺普利:老年患者药理学与临床疗效综述
Drugs Aging. 1997 Feb;10(2):131-66. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199710020-00006.
5
Infarct-related heart failure: the choice of ACE inhibitor does not matter.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1994 Jun;8(3):433-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00877919.
6
Effects of lisinopril on electromechanical properties and membrane currents in guinea-pig cardiac preparations.赖诺普利对豚鼠心脏标本机电特性和膜电流的影响。
Br J Pharmacol. 1993 Jul;109(3):873-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb13656.x.