Pilote Louise, Abrahamowicz Michal, Eisenberg Mark, Humphries Karin, Behlouli Hassan, Tu Jack V
Division of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, Montréal General Hospital, Montréal, Que.
CMAJ. 2008 May 6;178(10):1303-11. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060068.
Existing clinical trial data do not address whether all angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are similarly beneficial in improving survival and reducing the rate of readmission among patients with congestive heart failure. We sought to answer this question using administrative databases from Canada's 3 most populous provinces.
Using linked hospital discharge and prescription claims databases in Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia, we identified all patients 65 years or older who were admitted to hospital because of congestive heart failure between Jan. 1, 1998, and Mar. 31, 2002, and who had not been admitted for the same reason in the 3 years preceding the study period. We analyzed the association between the type of ACE inhibitor prescribed within 30 days after discharge and subsequent mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. We then adjusted for demographic, clinical, physician and hospital-related variables, with additional time-dependent variables representing current drug use and dosage. We chose ramipril as the reference category for comparison with the other ACE inhibitors because it has increasingly been prescribed to patients with congestive heart failure.
A total of 43 316 patients with congestive heart failure filled prescriptions for ACE inhibitors within 30 days after discharge from hospital. Demographic, clinical and prescription-related characteristics were similar among users of each type of ACE inhibitor. In the time-dependent model, the mortality associated with 5 ACE inhibitors was similar to that with ramipril: adjusted hazard ratios (and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 0.95 (0.89-1.02) for lisinopril, 0.92 (0.85-1.00) for fosinopril, 0.99 (0.88-1.11) for quinapril, 0.90 (0.77-1.06) for perindopril and 1.00 (0.80-1.24) for cilazapril. However, use of enalapril or captopril was associated with higher mortality compared with ramipril: adjusted hazard ratios (and 95% CIs) were 1.10 (1.04-1.16) for enalapril and 1.13 (1.01-1.26) for captopril.
When prescribing ACE inhibitors to patients, physicians should consider a possible 10%-15% increase in mortality with captopril and enalapril compared with ramipril among patients with congestive heart failure.
现有的临床试验数据未涉及所有血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂在改善充血性心力衰竭患者生存率及降低再入院率方面是否具有相似的益处。我们试图利用加拿大人口最多的三个省份的管理数据库来回答这个问题。
利用魁北克、安大略和不列颠哥伦比亚省的医院出院记录与处方索赔数据库的关联数据,我们确定了所有65岁及以上的患者,这些患者在1998年1月1日至2002年3月31日期间因充血性心力衰竭入院,且在研究期前3年内未曾因同一原因入院。我们使用Cox比例风险模型分析出院后30天内所开ACE抑制剂类型与后续死亡率之间的关联。然后我们对人口统计学、临床、医生和医院相关变量进行了调整,并加入了代表当前药物使用和剂量的额外时间依存变量。我们选择雷米普利作为与其他ACE抑制剂进行比较的参照类别,因为它越来越多地被用于充血性心力衰竭患者。
共有43316例充血性心力衰竭患者在出院后30天内开具了ACE抑制剂处方。每种ACE抑制剂使用者的人口统计学、临床和处方相关特征相似。在时间依存模型中,5种ACE抑制剂的死亡率与雷米普利相似:赖诺普利的调整风险比(及95%置信区间[CI])为0.95(0.89 - 1.02),福辛普利为0.92(0.85 - 1.00),喹那普利为0.99(0.88 - 1.11),培哚普利为0.90(0.77 - 1.06),西拉普利为1.00(0.80 - 1.24)。然而,与雷米普利相比,使用依那普利或卡托普利与更高的死亡率相关:依那普利的调整风险比(及95%CI)为1.10(1.04 - 1.16),卡托普利为1.13(1.01 - 1.26)。
在给充血性心力衰竭患者开ACE抑制剂时,医生应考虑到与雷米普利相比,卡托普利和依那普利可能会使死亡率增加10% - 15%。