Leaning M S, Gallivan S, Newlands E S, Dent J, Brampton M, Smith D B, Bagshawe K D
Department of Statistical Science, University College, London.
BMJ. 1992 Oct 3;305(6857):804-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6857.804.
To design and evaluate a computer advisory system for the treatment of gestational trophoblastic tumour.
A comparison of clinicians' treatment decisions with those of the computer system. Two datasets were used: one to calibrate the system and one to independently evaluate it.
Department of medical oncology.
Computerised records of 290 patients with low risk gestational trophoblastic tumour for whom the advisory system could predict the adequacy of treatment. The calibration set comprised patients admitted during 1979-86(227) and the test set patients during 1986-89(63).
The system's accuracy in predicting need to change treatment compared with clinicians' actions. The mean time faster that the system was in predicting the need to change treatment.
On the calibration dataset the system was 94% (164/174) accurate in predicting patients whose treatment was adequate, recommending change when none occurred in only 10 (6%) patients. In patients whose treatment was changed the system recommended change earlier than clinicians in 39/53 cases (74%), with a mean time advantage of 14.9 (SE 2.02) days. On the test dataset the system had an accuracy of 91% (31/34) in predicting treatment adequacy and a false positive rate of 9% (3/34). The system recommended change earlier than clinicians in 22/29 cases (76%), with a mean time advantage of 12.5 (2.22) days.
The computer advisory system could improve patient management by reducing the time spent receiving ineffective treatment. This has implications for both patient time and clinical costs.
设计并评估一个用于治疗妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的计算机咨询系统。
将临床医生的治疗决策与计算机系统的决策进行比较。使用了两个数据集:一个用于校准系统,另一个用于独立评估系统。
医学肿瘤学系。
290例低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者的计算机化记录,咨询系统可据此预测治疗的充分性。校准集包括1979 - 1986年期间入院的患者(227例),测试集包括1986 - 1989年期间的患者(63例)。
与临床医生的行动相比,系统预测改变治疗必要性的准确性。系统预测改变治疗必要性时平均快于临床医生的时间。
在校准数据集中,系统预测治疗充分的患者时准确率为94%(164/174),仅在10例(6%)患者中推荐改变治疗而实际未发生改变。在治疗发生改变的患者中,系统在39/53例(74%)中比临床医生更早推荐改变,平均时间优势为14.9(标准误2.02)天。在测试数据集中,系统预测治疗充分性的准确率为91%(31/34),假阳性率为9%(3/34)。系统在22/29例(76%)中比临床医生更早推荐改变,平均时间优势为12.5(2.22)天。
计算机咨询系统可通过减少接受无效治疗的时间来改善患者管理。这对患者时间和临床成本均有影响。