Pauleikhoff B, Hoffmann D
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr Grenzgeb. 1975 May;43(5):254-71.
Thefts without motive of pain have been known since the early 19th century. But the problem has not been solved. While they were formerly considered a mental disease, today they are not seen as something special. But they still happen. Only a small percentage of common shop-lifting can be called a psycholopathologic syndrome. Many explanations and analyses have been published which are discussed in detail. In a group described here comprehensively difficult marital situations full of conflict, marital sexual frustration, depression, physical and mental exhaustion and aggressive and suicidal tendencies are found. Theft appears to be closely connected with these. But the pattern of motivation and causation is by no means stereo-typed. In order to clear up such actions one will have to consider as exactly as possible the biographic connection and what happens during the act - quite apart from somatic conditions. Present assessment in reports is totally unsatisfactory. To clear up the controversial questions is urgently necessary.
无痛苦动机的盗窃行为自19世纪初就已为人所知。但这个问题尚未得到解决。虽然它们以前被认为是一种精神疾病,但如今已不被视为特殊情况。但此类盗窃行为仍在发生。普通商店行窃中只有一小部分可被称为精神病理综合征。已经发表了许多详细讨论的解释和分析。在此全面描述的一组案例中,发现存在充满冲突的艰难婚姻状况、婚姻性挫折、抑郁、身心疲惫以及攻击和自杀倾向。盗窃行为似乎与这些因素密切相关。但动机和因果关系模式绝非千篇一律。为了弄清楚此类行为,必须尽可能准确地考虑个人经历的联系以及行为过程中发生的事情——完全抛开身体状况不谈。报告中的当前评估完全不能令人满意。迫切需要澄清这些有争议的问题。