Okamura J, Kawai S, Ogawa M, Ohashi Y, Tani M, Inoue J, Kawarada Y, Kusano M, Kubo Y, Kuroda C
Osaka Teishin Hospital, Japan.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1992;31 Suppl:S20-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00687099.
A randomized clinical trial comparing L-TAE with Farmorubicin (FARM) and L-TAE with Adriamycin (ADR) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma was conducted from October 1989 through December 1990. In all, 192 hospitals participated in this study and 117 patients were entered. The patients were randomly allocated to group A (L-TAE+FARM) or group B (L-TAE+ADR). There was no significant intergroup difference in background factors. Additional treatment consisting of repeated TAE or surgery was given to 66 patients. Four factors were analyzed in this study: the percentage of reduction in tumor size, the change in the AFP level, lipiodol accumulation, and survival. None of these factors differed significantly between the two groups. The final evaluation of this study will be based on differences in survival after a long-term follow-up. Toxic effects manifested less frequently in group A than in group B, and the decrease in the platelet count in the peripheral blood was significantly lower in group A than in group B. These results suggest that FARM exerts a more favorable effect than does ADR in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
1989年10月至1990年12月进行了一项比较经肝动脉栓塞化疗(L-TAE)联合表柔比星(FARM)与L-TAE联合阿霉素(ADR)治疗肝细胞癌的随机临床试验。共有192家医院参与了本研究,117例患者入组。患者被随机分配至A组(L-TAE+FARM)或B组(L-TAE+ADR)。两组患者的基线因素无显著差异。66例患者接受了包括重复TAE或手术在内的额外治疗。本研究分析了四个因素:肿瘤大小缩小百分比、甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平变化、碘油蓄积及生存率。两组间这些因素均无显著差异。本研究的最终评估将基于长期随访后的生存差异。A组的毒性反应发生率低于B组,且A组外周血血小板计数的下降显著低于B组。这些结果表明,在肝细胞癌治疗中,FARM比ADR具有更有利的疗效。