Watanabe S, Nishioka M, Ohta Y, Ogawa N, Ito S, Yamamoto Y
3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Kagawa Medical School, Japan.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;33 Suppl:S93-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00686676.
The Cooperative Study Group conducted a study to assess the therapeutic effects of chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using either epirubicin hydrochloride (FARM) or doxorubicin hydrochloride (ADR). A total of 77 patients were enrolled in this study and randomized into 2 groups: 39 patients were treated with a FARM solution as the material for Lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE; FARM group), and 38 patients were treated with an ADR solution as the material for L-TAE (ADR group). For the FARM group, the 1-year survival rate was 69.9% and the 2-year survival rate was 44.5%. For the ADR group, the corresponding survival rates were 74.7% and 44.0%. The differences among the above figures were not statistically significant. As side effects, fever, nausea, and generalized fatigue occurred at almost the same frequencies in the two groups. Changes detected in the liver function and the peripheral blood cell count in both groups were not severe. There was no significant difference between the toxic effects observed in the two groups. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in therapeutic efficacy between the FARM and ADR groups.
协作研究组开展了一项研究,以评估使用盐酸表柔比星(FARM)或盐酸多柔比星(ADR)对晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者进行化疗栓塞的治疗效果。本研究共纳入77例患者,并随机分为2组:39例患者接受FARM溶液作为碘油经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)的材料进行治疗(FARM组),38例患者接受ADR溶液作为L-TAE的材料进行治疗(ADR组)。FARM组的1年生存率为69.9%,2年生存率为44.5%。ADR组的相应生存率分别为74.7%和44.0%。上述数据之间的差异无统计学意义。作为副作用,两组中发热、恶心和全身乏力的发生频率几乎相同。两组中检测到的肝功能和外周血细胞计数变化并不严重。两组观察到的毒性作用无显著差异。总之,FARM组和ADR组在治疗效果上无显著差异。