Gonzenbach H R, Simmen H P, Amgwerd R
Ann Surg. 1987 Mar;205(3):271-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198703000-00009.
In a randomized study the clinical and bacteriologic effectiveness of imipenem was compared with the classical combination of netilmicin with clindamycin in patients who had surgery for an intraperitoneal infection, localized or generalized, with positive bacteriologic findings of the specimen taken at surgery. Excluded were all patients who received other antibiotics before surgery, or who died within 3 days after antibiotic therapy was started. Imipenem was given at a dose of 500 mg t.i.d., clindamycin 600 mg t.i.d., and netilmicin according to serum levels. The diagnoses ranged from postoperative peritonitis, gallbladder empyema, perforated gastroduodenal ulcer, small bowel perforation with and without obstruction, and perforated appendicitis to perforation of the colon. The bacteriologic work-up included examination of the primary specimen (aerobic and anaerobic), the urine, feces, and serologic testing for Candida albicans once or twice a week and after the course of antibiotic therapy. In addition, pH measurements of abscesses and drainage fluids were performed. Ninety-three patients entered the study. Forty-seven patients were treated with imipenem (test group), and 46 patients were treated with the combination therapy (control group). The two groups did not show significant differences in age, sex, diagnostic groups, risk factors, primary bacteriology, and duration of therapy (mean: 6.7 days). Thirty-eight patients (80.9%) treated with imipenem were cured, six patients (12.8%) were improved, and there were three (6.4%) failures. The respective numbers for the control group were 31 (67.4%), 10 (21.7%), and 5 (10.9%). The mean duration of hospitalization was 19 days for the test group and 24.5 days for the control group. There were four wound infections in the test group and 11 wound infections in the control group. Imipenem is at least as effective in the adjuvant therapy of intra-abdominal infections as the combination of netilmicin with clindamycin.
在一项随机研究中,对接受腹腔内感染(局限性或全身性)手术且手术时采集标本细菌学检查呈阳性的患者,比较了亚胺培南与奈替米星联合克林霉素经典组合的临床及细菌学疗效。排除所有术前接受过其他抗生素治疗或在开始抗生素治疗后3天内死亡的患者。亚胺培南剂量为500mg每日3次,克林霉素600mg每日3次,奈替米星根据血清水平给药。诊断范围包括术后腹膜炎、胆囊积脓、胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔、伴或不伴梗阻的小肠穿孔、阑尾穿孔以及结肠穿孔。细菌学检查包括对原始标本(需氧和厌氧)、尿液、粪便进行检查,每周对白色念珠菌进行一到两次血清学检测以及在抗生素治疗疗程结束后检测。此外,还对脓肿和引流液进行pH测量。93例患者进入该研究。47例患者接受亚胺培南治疗(试验组),46例患者接受联合治疗(对照组)。两组在年龄、性别、诊断分组、危险因素、初始细菌学情况及治疗持续时间(平均:6.7天)方面无显著差异。接受亚胺培南治疗的38例患者(80.9%)治愈,6例患者(12.8%)病情改善,3例患者(6.4%)治疗失败。对照组相应数字分别为31例(67.4%)、10例(21.7%)和5例(10.9%)。试验组平均住院时间为19天,对照组为24.5天。试验组有4例伤口感染,对照组有11例伤口感染。亚胺培南在腹腔内感染辅助治疗中的疗效至少与奈替米星联合克林霉素相当。