Torres G, Vicente M
Sección Virología, Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile, Santiago.
Rev Med Chil. 1992 Apr;120(4):415-9.
Respiratory syncytial and adenovirus are 2 of the most important pathogens for respiratory infection in infancy. We compared the results of cellular cultures and immunofluorescence in the detection of these agents in nasopharyngeal exudates from hospitalized infants. Evidence for respiratory syncytial virus was searched in 776 samples. Immunofluorescence was much more sensitive, detecting 303 positive results, compared to only 142 for cell culture. Compared to immunofluorescence, the sensitivity and specificity of cell culture was 44% and 98%, respectively. Adenoviruses were investigated in 498 samples by both techniques. 88 positive results were identified by cell culture and only 30 by immunofluorescence. The sensitivity of immunofluorescence, compared to cell culture, was 31%, with a specificity of 99%. Thus, immunofluorescence is the technique of choice for detection of respiratory syncytial virus, while cell culture is preferable for adenovirus.
呼吸道合胞病毒和腺病毒是婴儿期呼吸道感染最重要的两种病原体。我们比较了细胞培养和免疫荧光法在检测住院婴儿鼻咽分泌物中这些病原体的结果。在776份样本中查找呼吸道合胞病毒的证据。免疫荧光法更为敏感,检测出303份阳性结果,而细胞培养仅检测出142份阳性结果。与免疫荧光法相比,细胞培养的敏感性和特异性分别为44%和98%。两种技术对498份样本进行了腺病毒检测。细胞培养鉴定出88份阳性结果,免疫荧光法仅鉴定出30份阳性结果。与细胞培养相比,免疫荧光法的敏感性为31%,特异性为99%。因此,免疫荧光法是检测呼吸道合胞病毒的首选技术,而细胞培养则更适合检测腺病毒。