Reisman R E
Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo School of Medicine.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992 Sep;90(3 Pt 1):335-9. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(05)80012-0.
To examine the postulate that the nature of the symptoms of initial insect sting anaphylaxis is related to the risk and severity of subsequent sting reactions, the results of field re-stings were analyzed in 220 patients who had had venom anaphylaxis and did not receive venom immunotherapy. The incidence of a reaction after the first re-sting was 56% in the total group, was more frequent in adults (74%) than in children (40%), and was unrelated to the time interval since the initial sting reaction. When re-sting reactions did occur, the nature of the symptoms was similar to the symptoms of the initial sting reaction. Reactions to repeated re-stings tended to be similar. Overall, more severe reactions to re-stings occurred eventually in 24 patients. These observations confirm the frequent self-limiting course of insect sting allergy, especially in children, and the repetitive nature of specific anaphylactic symptoms, and the observations thus suggest that patients with mild to moderate anaphylactic symptoms probably do not require venom immunotherapy.
为检验初始昆虫叮咬过敏反应症状的性质与后续叮咬反应的风险及严重程度相关这一假设,我们分析了220例曾发生毒液过敏反应且未接受毒液免疫治疗的患者再次野外叮咬的结果。首次再次叮咬后反应的发生率在总人群中为56%,在成人中(74%)比在儿童中(40%)更常见,且与自初始叮咬反应以来的时间间隔无关。当再次叮咬反应确实发生时,症状的性质与初始叮咬反应的症状相似。对重复再次叮咬的反应往往相似。总体而言,最终有24例患者对再次叮咬出现了更严重的反应。这些观察结果证实了昆虫叮咬过敏反应常见的自限性病程,尤其是在儿童中,以及特异性过敏症状的重复性,因此这些观察结果表明,有轻至中度过敏症状的患者可能不需要毒液免疫治疗。