Small P
Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ann Allergy. 1992 Jan;68(1):30-4.
We compared the relative antihistaminic effects of loratadine (10 mg), terfenadine (120 mg), and placebo in patients with tree pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. Wheals were produced by epicutaneous tests with serial dilutions of histamine phosphate, tree and grass pollen extracts before ingestion of medication. Repeat tests were performed after seven days of treatment. Terfenadine was more effective than both loratadine (P less than .01) and placebo (P less than .001) at suppressing histamine induced wheals. Terfenadine was more effective than placebo (P less than .01), but not loratadine at inhibiting both tree-induced and grass-induced epicutaneous reactions. In this study, terfenadine was more potent than loratadine in inhibiting both histamine-induced and allergen-induced epicutaneous wheals.
我们比较了氯雷他定(10毫克)、特非那定(120毫克)和安慰剂对花粉诱发的变应性鼻炎患者的相对抗组胺作用。在服用药物前,通过用磷酸组胺、树木和草花粉提取物的系列稀释液进行皮肤试验产生风团。治疗七天后进行重复试验。在抑制组胺诱发的风团方面,特非那定比氯雷他定(P<0.01)和安慰剂(P<0.001)都更有效。在抑制树木诱发和草诱发的皮肤反应方面,特非那定比安慰剂更有效(P<0.01),但不比氯雷他定更有效。在本研究中,特非那定在抑制组胺诱发和变应原诱发的皮肤风团方面比氯雷他定更有效。