Ahlenius S
Department of Neuropharmacology, Astra Research Centre, Södertälje, Sweden.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1992 May;345(5):516-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00168942.
The present series of experiments was performed in order to determine the relative role of presynaptic and somato-dendritic autoreceptors for the sedative effects produced by systemically administered dopaminergic agonists. Thus, the effects of intracerebral administration of 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine (3-PPP), or sulpiride, enantiomers on spontaneous locomotor activity was investigated in rats. It was found that the local application of (-)3-PPP, but not (+)3-PPP, into the nucleus accumbens (1.25-80.0 micrograms, bilaterally) produced a suppression of the locomotor activity, whereas the local application of the two enantiomers into the ventral tegmental area resulted in a suppression of the locomotor activity in the same dose range. Thus, the full dopamine D2 agonist (+)3-PPP produced suppression of locomotor activity only after local application into the somato-dendritic region, suggesting that in terminal areas postsynaptic receptor stimulation effectively counterbalanced the functional consequences of presynaptic receptor stimulation. The sulpiride enantiomers both produced a suppression of locomotor activity after local application into the accumbens (0.2-5.0 micrograms, bilaterally). In the ventral tegmental area, however, (-)sulpiride administration (0.2-5.0 micrograms, bilaterally) resulted in an increased locomotion, whereas the (+)enantiomer produced no effect or, at the highest dose (5.0 micrograms), a suppression of the locomotor activity. These observations indicate that for a dopamine D2 antagonist, the postsynaptic receptor blockade in the terminal region, resulting in behavioral suppression, not only counteract compensatory effects produced via the presynaptic receptor in this region, but also to a great extent overshadow the functional consequences of somatodendritic autoreceptor blockade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
进行本系列实验是为了确定突触前和体树突自受体在全身给药多巴胺能激动剂产生的镇静作用中的相对作用。因此,研究了向大鼠脑内注射3-(3-羟苯基)-N-正丙基哌啶(3-PPP)或舒必利对自发运动活性的影响。结果发现,向伏隔核双侧局部注射(-)3-PPP(1.25 - 80.0微克)可抑制运动活性,而(+)3-PPP则无此作用;而向腹侧被盖区局部注射两种对映体在相同剂量范围内均能抑制运动活性。因此,完全多巴胺D2激动剂(+)3-PPP仅在局部注入体树突区域后才产生运动活性抑制,这表明在终末区域,突触后受体刺激有效地抵消了突触前受体刺激的功能后果。舒必利对映体在向伏隔核双侧局部注射(0.2 - 5.0微克)后均产生运动活性抑制。然而,在腹侧被盖区,注射(-)舒必利(0.2 - 5.0微克,双侧)导致运动增加,而(+)对映体无作用,或在最高剂量(5.0微克)时抑制运动活性。这些观察结果表明,对于多巴胺D2拮抗剂,终末区域的突触后受体阻断导致行为抑制,不仅抵消了该区域通过突触前受体产生的代偿作用,而且在很大程度上掩盖了体树突自受体阻断的功能后果。(摘要截选至250词)