Jensen P B, Roed H, Sehested M, Demant E J, Vindeløv L, Christensen I J, Hansen H H
Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1992;31(1):46-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00695993.
The aim of our investigations is to evaluate whether the sensitivity patterns of small-cell lung-cancer (SCLC) cell lines in vitro can be used in evaluating new drugs and in selecting drugs for the optimization of combination therapy. In our attempts to obtain a panel of cell lines demonstrating differential patterns in sensitivity, we have developed three SCLC lines exhibiting different types of multidrug resistance (MDR). In the present investigations we compared the sensitivity patterns shown by five wild-type SCLC lines and three MDR lines in response to six different types of drugs: doxorubicin, cytarabine, carmustine, cisplatin, vincristine, and etoposide. In the wild-type SCLC cell lines, the range of variation in sensitivity to all drugs was within a factor of 10. Cell lines showing low sensitivity to doxorubicin also exhibited low sensitivity to etoposide and vincristine, and vice versa. In contrast, the pattern of sensitivity to carmustine was almost the opposite of that to doxorubicin. A tendency to an inverse relationship between doxorubicin and carmustine sensitivity was also observed when doxorubicin sensitivity was reduced in near stationary cells and in cells exposed to the metabolic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose. In agreement with the pattern observed for the wild-type lines, all of the MDR sublines demonstrated collateral sensitivity to carmustine. As to cytarabine, the wild-type lines expressed a sensitivity pattern similar to that shown in response to doxorubicin. Interestingly, the opposite pattern was found in the MDR lines, as all three demonstrated cytarabine hypersensitivity. The combination of alkylating agents and "MDR" drugs are of proven clinical benefit in the treatment of solid tumors, as is the combination of anthracycline and cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia. The experimentally derived sensitivity data on cytarabine, alkylating agents, and MDR drugs (i.e., etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine) thus resemble the clinical experience with these drugs, and we conclude that the use of a clonogenic assay on the described panel of SCLC cell lines can give valuable information for the selection of agents for combination therapy.
我们研究的目的是评估小细胞肺癌(SCLC)细胞系在体外的敏感性模式是否可用于评估新药以及选择药物以优化联合治疗。在我们试图获得一组显示出不同敏感性模式的细胞系的过程中,我们培育出了三种表现出不同类型多药耐药(MDR)的SCLC细胞系。在本研究中,我们比较了五个野生型SCLC细胞系和三个MDR细胞系对六种不同类型药物的敏感性模式:阿霉素、阿糖胞苷、卡莫司汀、顺铂、长春新碱和依托泊苷。在野生型SCLC细胞系中,对所有药物的敏感性变化范围在10倍以内。对阿霉素敏感性低的细胞系对依托泊苷和长春新碱的敏感性也低,反之亦然。相比之下,对卡莫司汀的敏感性模式几乎与对阿霉素的相反。当在接近静止的细胞和暴露于代谢抑制剂2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖的细胞中阿霉素敏感性降低时,也观察到阿霉素和卡莫司汀敏感性之间呈负相关的趋势。与野生型细胞系观察到的模式一致,所有MDR亚系对卡莫司汀均表现出协同敏感性。至于阿糖胞苷,野生型细胞系表现出与对阿霉素反应相似的敏感性模式。有趣的是,在MDR细胞系中发现了相反的模式,因为所有三个细胞系均表现出阿糖胞苷超敏性。烷化剂与“MDR”药物的联合在实体瘤治疗中已被证明具有临床益处,蒽环类药物与阿糖胞苷在急性髓细胞白血病中的联合也是如此。因此,关于阿糖胞苷、烷化剂和MDR药物(即依托泊苷、阿霉素、长春新碱)的实验得出的敏感性数据类似于这些药物的临床经验,并且我们得出结论,在所描述的SCLC细胞系组上使用克隆形成试验可为联合治疗药物的选择提供有价值的信息。