Jensen P B, Christensen I J, Sehested M, Hansen H H, Vindeløv L
Department of Oncology, Finsen Institute/Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Br J Cancer. 1993 Feb;67(2):311-20. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.58.
A panel of six 'wild type' and three VP-16 resistant small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines is used to evaluate to what extent in vitro sensitivity testing using a clonogenic assay can contribute to combine cytotoxic drugs to regimens with improved efficacy against SCLC. The resistant lines include (a) H69/DAU4, which is classical multidrug resistant (MDR) with a P-glycoprotein efflux pump (b) NYH/VM, which exhibits an altered topoisomerase II (topo II) activity and (c) H69/VP, which is cross-resistant to vincristine, exhibits a reduced drug accumulation as H69/DAU4 but is without P-glycoprotein. 19 anticancer agents were compared in the panel. The MDR lines demonstrated, as expected, cross-resistance to all topo II drugs, but also different patterns of collateral sensitivity to BCNU, cisplatin, ara-C, hydroxyurea, and to the topo I inhibitor camptothecin. The complete panel of nine cell lines clearly demonstrated diverse sensitivity patterns to drugs with different modes of action. Correlation analysis showed high correlation coefficients (CC) among drug analogues (e.g. VP-16/VM-26 0.99, vincristine/vindesine 0.89), and between drugs with similar mechanisms of action (e.g. BCNU/Cisplatin 0.89, VP-16/Doxorubicin 0.92), whereas different drug classes demonstrated low or even negative CC (e.g. BCNU/VP-16 -0.21). When the CC of the 19 drug patterns to VP-16 were plotted against the CC to BCNU, clustering was observed between drugs acting on microtubules, on topo II, alkylating agents, and antimetabolites. In this plot, camptothecin and ara-C patterns were promising by virtue of their lack of cross-resistance to alkylating agents and topo II drugs. Thus, the differential cytotoxicity patterns on this panel of cells can (1) give information about drug mechanism of action, (2) enable the selection and combination of non-cross-resistant drugs, and (3) show where new drugs 'fit in' among established agents.
使用一组由六个“野生型”和三个对VP - 16耐药的小细胞肺癌(SCLC)细胞系,来评估使用克隆形成试验进行的体外敏感性测试在多大程度上有助于将细胞毒性药物组合成具有更高SCLC疗效的方案。耐药细胞系包括:(a)H69/DAU4,它是具有P - 糖蛋白外排泵的经典多药耐药(MDR)细胞系;(b)NYH/VM,其拓扑异构酶II(topo II)活性发生改变;(c)H69/VP,它对长春新碱具有交叉耐药性,与H69/DAU4一样药物蓄积减少,但没有P - 糖蛋白。在该细胞系组中比较了19种抗癌药物。正如预期的那样,MDR细胞系对所有topo II药物都表现出交叉耐药性,但对卡氮芥、顺铂、阿糖胞苷、羟基脲以及拓扑异构酶I抑制剂喜树碱也有不同模式的间接敏感性。这九个细胞系的完整组清楚地显示出对具有不同作用模式的药物有不同的敏感性模式。相关性分析显示药物类似物之间(例如VP - 16/VM - 26为0.99,长春新碱/长春地辛为0.89)以及具有相似作用机制的药物之间(例如卡氮芥/顺铂为0.89,VP - 16/阿霉素为0.92)具有高相关系数(CC),而不同药物类别显示出低甚至负的CC(例如卡氮芥/VP - 16为 - 0.21)。当将19种药物模式与VP - 16的CC值与与卡氮芥的CC值绘制在一起时,观察到作用于微管、topo II、烷化剂和抗代谢物的药物之间出现聚类。在该图中,喜树碱和阿糖胞苷的模式因其对烷化剂和topo II药物缺乏交叉耐药性而很有前景。因此,该细胞系组上不同的细胞毒性模式能够:(1)提供有关药物作用机制的信息;(2)实现非交叉耐药药物的选择和组合;(3)显示新药在已确立药物中的“契合点”。