Gaydos C A, Bobo L, Welsh L, Hook E W, Viscidi R, Quinn T C
Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Sex Transm Dis. 1992 Nov-Dec;19(6):303-8.
A portion of the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) gene from 15 Chlamydia trachomatis serovars was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the product was analyzed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). A set of primers was used to amplify an 871 base pair gene fragment encompassing the 4 hypervariable regions of MOMP. AluI digestion of the product gave distinctive patterns for the 15 serovars as demonstrated on silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. A triple digest with EcoRI, HinfI, and HpaII allowed improved discrimination between closely related serovars (C, H, I, J, L3). PCR and RFLP were used to type 50 wild-type clinical isolates and results were compared to results of the solid-phase enzyme immunoassay typing method. These isolates represented the most prevalent genital serovars (D, E, F, K, I and J) in the local sexually transmitted diseases clinic population. For specimens containing 1 serovar, the results of the two methods were similar for 42 samples and discordant for 1 sample. In addition, two samples showed evidence of mixed infection with two serovars as identified by both methods. Five additional specimens contained two serovars, as shown by one or both methods. In all five such specimens, the two typing methods agreed on at least one of the two serovars. For both single and multiple serovar specimens, there was concordance between the two typing methods for 16/17 E serovars, 8/9 D serovars, 8/8 F serovars, 7/7 I serovars, 7/7 J serovars, 5/8 K serovars, and 0/2 G serovars.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增了15种沙眼衣原体血清型的主要外膜蛋白(MOMP)基因的一部分,并通过限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析了产物。使用一组引物扩增了一个包含MOMP的4个高变区的871碱基对基因片段。产物经AluI酶切后,在银染聚丙烯酰胺凝胶上显示出15种血清型的独特图谱。用EcoRI、HinfI和HpaII进行三重酶切可更好地区分密切相关的血清型(C、H、I、J、L3)。PCR和RFLP用于对50株野生型临床分离株进行分型,并将结果与固相酶免疫分析分型方法的结果进行比较。这些分离株代表了当地性传播疾病门诊人群中最常见的生殖器血清型(D、E、F、K、I和J)。对于含有1种血清型的标本,两种方法的结果在42个样本中相似,在1个样本中不一致。此外,两种方法均鉴定出两个样本存在两种血清型的混合感染。另外5个标本含有两种血清型,两种方法中的一种或两种均显示如此。在所有这5个标本中,两种分型方法对两种血清型中的至少一种达成了一致。对于单血清型和多血清型标本,两种分型方法在16/17个E血清型、8/9个D血清型、8/8个F血清型、7/7个I血清型、7/7个J血清型、5/8个K血清型和0/2个G血清型中具有一致性。(摘要截短于250字)