Sanderson A, Carpenter R
Fairfield Hospital, Stotfold, Nr Hitchin, Herts, U.K.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;23(4):269-75. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(92)90049-o.
Eye movement desensitization (EMD) and a control procedure, image confrontation (IC) were compared in a group of 58 phobics, 31 of them arachnophobes. Subjects confronted disturbing images in a single-session crossover trial. Anxiety levels were recorded on the SUD Scale. Whenever practicable, SUDs to feared objects were also recorded. EMD and IC were equally effective in reducing anxiety levels. After 1 month, during which subjects were encouraged to use IC daily, improvement was maintained. Since exposure to the disturbing image is common to both methods it must be presumed to be the basis of change when EMD is used in cases of phobia.
在一组58名恐惧症患者(其中31名是恐蛛症患者)中,对眼动脱敏疗法(EMD)和一种对照程序——意象对抗疗法(IC)进行了比较。受试者在单次交叉试验中面对令人不安的图像。使用主观困扰程度(SUD)量表记录焦虑水平。只要可行,还记录了对恐惧对象的主观困扰程度。眼动脱敏疗法和意象对抗疗法在降低焦虑水平方面同样有效。在为期1个月的时间里,鼓励受试者每天使用意象对抗疗法,之后改善情况得以维持。由于两种方法都有接触令人不安图像的环节,所以在恐惧症病例中使用眼动脱敏疗法时,必须假定这是改变的基础。