Beović B, Bonac B, Kese D, Avsic-Zupanc T, Kreft S, Lesnicar G, Gorisek-Rebersek J, Rezar L, Letonja S
Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Japljeva 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003 Oct;22(10):584-91. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-0997-0. Epub 2003 Sep 12.
A prospective study was initiated to analyse the bacterial aetiology and clinical picture of mild community-acquired pneumonia in Slovenia using the previously described Pneumonia Severity Index. Radiographically confirmed cases of pneumonia in patients treated with oral antibiotics in seven study centres were included. An aetiological diagnosis was attempted using culture of blood and sputum, urinary antigen testing for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila, and antibody testing for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila in paired serum samples. One hundred thirteen patients were evaluable for clinical presentation and 109 for aetiological diagnosis. At least one pathogen was detected in 62.4% patients. The most common causative agents were Mycoplasma pneumoniae in 24.8%, Chlamydia pneumoniae in 21.1%, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in 13.8% of patients. Dual infection was detected in 8.3% of patients. Most patients suffered from cough, fatigue, and fever. Patients with atypical aetiology of pneumonia differed from those with typical bacterial pneumonia or pneumonia of unknown aetiology in age, presence of dyspnea, and bronchial breathing on lung auscultation. Patients with pneumococcal, chlamydial, and mycoplasmal infections differed in age, risk class, presence of dyspnea, bronchial breathing, and proteinuria. There was an overlap of other clinical symptoms, underlying conditions, and laboratory and radiographic findings among the groups of patients classified by aetiology. Since patients with mild community-acquired pneumonia exhibit similar clinical characteristics and, moreover, since a substantial proportion of cases are attributable to atypical bacteria, broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment seems to be recommended.
开展了一项前瞻性研究,以使用先前描述的肺炎严重指数分析斯洛文尼亚轻度社区获得性肺炎的细菌病因和临床症状。纳入了在七个研究中心接受口服抗生素治疗且经影像学确诊的肺炎病例。尝试通过血液和痰液培养、肺炎链球菌和嗜肺军团菌的尿抗原检测以及配对血清样本中肺炎支原体、肺炎衣原体和嗜肺军团菌的抗体检测进行病因诊断。113例患者可进行临床表现评估,109例可进行病因诊断。62.4%的患者检测到至少一种病原体。最常见的病原体是肺炎支原体,占患者的24.8%;肺炎衣原体,占21.1%;肺炎链球菌,占13.8%。8.3%的患者检测到双重感染。大多数患者有咳嗽、乏力和发热症状。肺炎病因不典型的患者在年龄、是否存在呼吸困难以及肺部听诊时的支气管呼吸音方面与典型细菌性肺炎或病因不明的肺炎患者不同。肺炎球菌、衣原体和支原体感染患者在年龄、风险等级、是否存在呼吸困难、支气管呼吸音和蛋白尿方面存在差异。按病因分类的患者组之间在其他临床症状、基础疾病以及实验室和影像学检查结果方面存在重叠。由于轻度社区获得性肺炎患者表现出相似的临床特征,而且由于相当一部分病例归因于非典型细菌,因此似乎建议使用广谱抗生素治疗。