Rüsseler Jascha, Probst Stefan, Johannes Sönke, Münte Thomas
Department of Neuropsychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Sep;25(6):815-29. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.6.815.16469.
Differences in word processing between adult developmental dyslexic (n = 12) and normal readers (n = 12) were studied using event-related brain potentials recorded while subjects performed a recognition memory task. During the first part of the experiment, words were presented consecutively, and within this phase one third of the words were repeated. Subjects had to indicate whether a given word had previously been seen or not. After a delay of 1 hr, a second phase was administered. Here, another list containing 33% old words (presented in Phase 1) and 66% new words was shown and an old/new decision was required. In both categories, half of the words presented in either phase were of high normative frequency, and the other half were of low-frequency in the German language. Recognition performance was superior in normal readers for both high- and low-frequency words. In Phase 1, a fronto-centrally distributed N400 repetition effect discriminated between correctly identified old and new words (new words more negative). This effect was present for dyslexic as well as normal readers and for high- and low-frequency words. Between 450 and 800 ms, a 'P600 old/new effect' emerged (ERPs evoked by old words were more positive than those for new words). This effect was larger for low-frequency words. In Phase 2, an old/new effect was obtained for normal readers only. These findings are discussed in relation to current concepts of dyslexia and of semantic processing.
利用事件相关脑电位,研究了成年发展性阅读障碍者(n = 12)和正常阅读者(n = 12)在进行识别记忆任务时的文字处理差异。在实验的第一部分,单词连续呈现,在此阶段三分之一的单词会重复出现。受试者必须指出某个给定单词之前是否见过。经过1小时的延迟后,进入第二阶段。此时,展示另一个包含33%旧单词(在第一阶段呈现过)和66%新单词的列表,并要求做出旧/新判断。在这两个类别中,任一阶段呈现的单词一半是高规范频率的,另一半是低频率的德语单词。正常阅读者在高频和低频单词的识别表现上均更优。在第一阶段,一个从前额中央分布的N400重复效应区分了正确识别的旧单词和新单词(新单词更负)。阅读障碍者和正常阅读者以及高频和低频单词都存在这种效应。在450到800毫秒之间,出现了一个“P600旧/新效应”(旧单词诱发的ERP比新单词更正向)。这种效应在低频单词中更大。在第二阶段,仅在正常阅读者中获得了旧/新效应。结合当前关于阅读障碍和语义处理的概念对这些发现进行了讨论。