• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较雷伊和泰勒复杂图形:一项针对年轻人和老年人的重测研究。

Comparing the Rey and Taylor complex figures: a test-retest study in young and older adults.

作者信息

Gagnon Michèle, Awad Nesrine, Mertens Valérie B, Messier Claude

机构信息

Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Sep;25(6):878-90. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.6.878.16480.

DOI:10.1076/jcen.25.6.878.16480
PMID:13680464
Abstract

The Rey and Taylor figures, two visual perception and memory tests, are not equivalent in terms of their difficulty. The purpose of this study was to examine factors such as age, gender, order of administration, copy time, and copy score that could account for the variability in recall performance. Copy score was shown to be the best overall predictor of recall. Younger participants recalled more units than older participants on both complex figures. Furthermore, older participants appeared to benefit more from the presentation of the Taylor figure first compared to when they were presented with the Rey figure first. The present findings reveal the importance of test order and provide equations that can be used to facilitate the comparison of scores derived from the two figures in test-retest situations.

摘要

雷氏和泰勒图形测试是两项视觉感知与记忆测试,在难度方面并不等同。本研究的目的是考察年龄、性别、施测顺序、临摹时间和临摹分数等因素,这些因素可能解释回忆表现中的变异性。结果表明,临摹分数是回忆的最佳总体预测指标。在两个复杂图形测试中,较年轻的参与者比年长的参与者回忆起更多的单元。此外,与先呈现雷氏图形相比,年长的参与者似乎在先呈现泰勒图形时受益更多。本研究结果揭示了测试顺序的重要性,并提供了一些方程式,可用于在重测情况下便于比较从这两个图形得出的分数。

相似文献

1
Comparing the Rey and Taylor complex figures: a test-retest study in young and older adults.比较雷伊和泰勒复杂图形:一项针对年轻人和老年人的重测研究。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Sep;25(6):878-90. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.6.878.16480.
2
Explicit and objective scoring criteria for the taylor complex figure test.泰勒复合图形测试的明确且客观的评分标准。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 May;26(3):405-15. doi: 10.1080/13803390490510112.
3
Four studies comparing the Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor complex figures.四项比较雷-奥斯特里茨复杂图形和泰勒复杂图形的研究。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991 Jul;13(4):587-99. doi: 10.1080/01688639108401073.
4
Comparability of total score performance on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure and a modified Taylor Complex Figure.雷伊-奥斯特里赫复杂图形测验与改良版泰勒复杂图形测验总分表现的可比性。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 May;24(3):370-82. doi: 10.1076/jcen.24.3.370.984.
5
Using the Rey-Osterrieth and modified Taylor complex figures with older adults: a preliminary examination of accuracy score comparability.使用 Rey-Osterrieth 和改良版 Taylor 复杂图形测试老年人:准确性得分可比性的初步研究。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 May;25(3):197-203. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq003. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
6
Comparability of the Rey-Osterrieth and Modified Taylor Complex Figures using total scores, completion times, and construct validation.使用总分、完成时间和结构效度比较雷-奥斯特里思复杂图形测验和改良泰勒复杂图形测验。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Nov;28(8):1482-97. doi: 10.1080/13803390500434441.
7
Effects of age on the Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor complex figures: test-retest data using an intentional learning paradigm.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1992 Sep;14(5):647-61. doi: 10.1080/01688639208402853.
8
Does processing style affect recall of the Rey-Osterrieth or Taylor complex figures?加工方式会影响对雷-奥斯特里茨或泰勒复杂图形的记忆吗?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991 Jul;13(4):600-6. doi: 10.1080/01688639108401074.
9
The role of perceptual bias in complex figure recall.知觉偏差在复杂图形回忆中的作用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Sep;26(6):838-45. doi: 10.1080/13803390490509556.
10
Mayo's Older Americans Normative Studies: Visual Form Discrimination and copy trial of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure.梅奥老年美国人规范研究:视觉形式辨别与雷-奥斯特里茨复杂图形临摹测验
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 May;29(4):377-84. doi: 10.1080/13803390600726803.

引用本文的文献

1
Visuospatial memory in apraxia: Exploring quantitative drawing metrics to assess the representation of local and global information.失用症中的视觉空间记忆:探索定量绘图指标以评估局部和全局信息的表征。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan;53(1):409-427. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01531-w. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
2
Cognitive outcomes after multimodal treatment in adult glioma patients: A meta-analysis.成人脑胶质瘤患者多模态治疗后的认知结果:一项荟萃分析。
Neuro Oncol. 2023 Aug 3;25(8):1395-1414. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noad045.
3
Persistence of neuropsychological testing deficits in mild cognitive impairment.
轻度认知障碍中神经心理学测试缺陷的持续性
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(2):168-78. doi: 10.1159/000235732. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
4
Aging: compensation or maturation?衰老:是代偿还是成熟?
Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 1;32(4):1891-904. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jun 21.