Suppr超能文献

轻度认知障碍中神经心理学测试缺陷的持续性

Persistence of neuropsychological testing deficits in mild cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Teng Edmond, Tingus Kathleen D, Lu Po H, Cummings Jeffrey L

机构信息

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(2):168-78. doi: 10.1159/000235732. Epub 2009 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The significant variability across studies of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in rates of progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and reversion to normal cognition may be due to differences in specific neuropsychological tests and thresholds used to define MCI.

METHODS

We assessed 115 subjects with amnestic (AMN) or non-amnestic (NON) MCI on a standardized neuropsychological battery at baseline and after a mean follow-up of 16.4 months to determine the prevalence and persistence of deficits identified with specific tests.

RESULTS

The prevalence of impaired performance varied widely across tests. Deficits were more persistent in the AMN group than in the NON group. Baseline deficits in Visual Reproduction II and the California Verbal Learning Test were the best predictors of persistent memory impairment. Subjects who at baseline were impaired on multiple memory tests or had poorer overall memory performance were more likely to exhibit persistent memory deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of different neuropsychological tests and thresholds to diagnose MCI identified subsets of subjects with different rates of persistence of cognitive impairment. Standardization of the operational definition of cognitive impairment in MCI may result in more consistent predictions of progression to AD.

摘要

背景

在轻度认知障碍(MCI)进展为阿尔茨海默病(AD)以及恢复正常认知的研究中,不同研究之间存在显著差异,这可能是由于用于定义MCI的特定神经心理学测试和阈值不同所致。

方法

我们在基线时以及平均随访16.4个月后,使用标准化神经心理学测试组合对115名遗忘型(AMN)或非遗忘型(NON)MCI患者进行评估,以确定特定测试所发现缺陷的患病率和持续性。

结果

不同测试中表现受损的患病率差异很大。遗忘型组的缺陷比非遗忘型组更具持续性。视觉再现II和加利福尼亚言语学习测试中的基线缺陷是持续性记忆损害的最佳预测指标。在基线时多项记忆测试受损或总体记忆表现较差的受试者更有可能出现持续性记忆缺陷。

结论

使用不同的神经心理学测试和阈值来诊断MCI,确定了认知障碍持续性发生率不同的受试者亚组。MCI中认知障碍操作定义的标准化可能会使AD进展的预测更加一致。

相似文献

2
5
Neuropsychological characteristics of mild cognitive impairment subgroups.轻度认知障碍亚组的神经心理学特征。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;77(2):159-65. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.045567. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
7
Multiple cognitive deficits in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.遗忘型轻度认知障碍中的多种认知缺陷
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1159/000095303. Epub 2006 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

5
Predictors of Reversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Normal Cognition.从轻度认知障碍恢复到正常认知的预测因素
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;43(3-4):204-214. doi: 10.1159/000456070. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

3
Predicting rapid clinical progression in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.预测遗忘型轻度认知障碍的快速临床进展
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25(2):170-7. doi: 10.1159/000113014. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
10
Using different memory cutoffs to assess mild cognitive impairment.使用不同的记忆临界值来评估轻度认知障碍。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;14(11):911-9. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000229651.62137.e2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验