van Zyl E, Steyn P L
Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992 Jan;42(1):193-8. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-1-193.
The inclusion of "Pseudomonas maltophilia" Hugh 1981 in the genus Xanthomonas as Xanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1981) Swings et al. 1983 is questioned in view of the significant differences between these two taxa. This reclassification is not acceptable if practical means of differentiation in this genus are considered. The proposed alteration of the description of the genus Xanthomonas is also questionable because of the implications for everyday phytobacteriology. In view of the natural similarities, as well as the profound differences, between X. maltophilia and the genus Xanthomonas, we propose that a new genus should be created for X. maltophilia, which could be placed together with the genus Xanthomonas in a separate natural group.
鉴于这两个分类单元之间存在显著差异,1981年休将“嗜麦芽假单胞菌”归入黄单胞菌属,命名为嗜麦芽黄单胞菌(休,1981年)斯温斯等人,1983年,这一归类受到质疑。如果考虑该属的实际鉴别方法,这种重新分类是不可接受的。由于对日常植物细菌学的影响,对黄单胞菌属描述的拟议更改也存在疑问。鉴于嗜麦芽黄单胞菌与黄单胞菌属之间存在自然相似性以及深刻差异,我们建议为嗜麦芽黄单胞菌创建一个新属,该新属可与黄单胞菌属一起归入一个单独的自然类群。