Moulin D E, Johnson N G, Murray-Parsons N, Geoghegan M F, Goodwin V A, Chester M A
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London.
CMAJ. 1992 Mar 15;146(6):891-7.
To provide guidelines for the institution and maintenance of a continuous subcutaneous narcotic infusion program for cancer patients with chronic pain through an analysis of the narcotic requirements and treatment outcomes of patients who underwent such therapy and a comparison of the costs of two commonly used infusion systems.
Retrospective study.
Tertiary care facilities and patients' homes.
Of 481 patients seen in consultation for cancer pain between July 1987 and April 1990, 60 (12%) met the eligibility criteria (i.e., standard medical management had failed, and they had adequate supervision at home).
Continuous subcutaneous infusion with hydromorphone hydrochloride or morphine started on an inpatient basis and continued at home whenever possible.
Patient selectivity, narcotic dosing requirements, discharge rate, patient preference for analgesic regimen, side effects, complications and cost-effectiveness.
The mean initial maintenance infusion dose after dose titration was almost three times higher than the dose required before infusion (hydromorphone or equivalent 6.2 v. 2.1 mg/h). Eighteen patients died, and the remaining 42 were discharged home for a mean of 94.4 (standard deviation 128.3) days (extremes 12 and 741 days). The mean maximum infusion rate was 24.1 mg/h (extremes 0.5 and 180 mg/h). All but one of the patients preferred the infusion system to their previous oral analgesic regimen. Despite major dose escalations nausea and vomiting were well controlled in all cases. Twelve patients (20%) experienced serious systemic toxic effects or complications; six became encephalopathic, which necessitated dose reduction, five had a subcutaneous infection necessitating antibiotic treatment, and one had respiratory depression. The programmable computerized infusion pump was found to be more cost-effective than the disposable infusion device after a break-even point of 8 months.
Continuous subcutaneous infusion of opioid drugs with the use of a portable programmable pump is safe and effective in selected patients who have failed to respond to standard medical treatment of their cancer pain. Dose titration may require rapid dose escalation, but this is usually well tolerated. For most communities embarking on such a program a programmable infusion system will be more cost-effective than a disposable system.
通过分析接受此类治疗患者的麻醉剂需求和治疗结果,并比较两种常用输注系统的成本,为癌症慢性疼痛患者建立和维持持续皮下麻醉剂输注方案提供指导。
回顾性研究。
三级护理机构和患者家中。
在1987年7月至1990年4月期间因癌症疼痛前来咨询的481例患者中,60例(12%)符合入选标准(即标准药物治疗无效,且在家中有充分的监护)。
以住院为基础开始持续皮下输注盐酸氢吗啡酮或吗啡,尽可能在家中继续进行。
患者选择、麻醉剂给药需求、出院率、患者对镇痛方案的偏好、副作用、并发症和成本效益。
剂量滴定后的平均初始维持输注剂量几乎比输注前所需剂量高3倍(氢吗啡酮或等效物为6.2对2.1毫克/小时)。18例患者死亡,其余42例出院回家,平均94.4天(标准差128.3天)(范围为12至741天)。平均最大输注速率为24.1毫克/小时(范围为0.5至180毫克/小时)。除1例患者外,所有患者都更喜欢输注系统而非先前的口服镇痛方案。尽管剂量大幅增加,但所有病例中的恶心和呕吐均得到良好控制。12例患者(20%)出现严重的全身毒性作用或并发症;6例出现脑病,需要减少剂量,5例发生皮下感染,需要抗生素治疗,1例出现呼吸抑制。在8个月的收支平衡点之后,发现可编程计算机化输注泵比一次性输注装置更具成本效益。
对于对癌症疼痛的标准药物治疗无反应的特定患者,使用便携式可编程泵持续皮下输注阿片类药物是安全有效的。剂量滴定可能需要快速增加剂量,但通常耐受性良好。对于大多数开展此类方案的社区而言,可编程输注系统比一次性系统更具成本效益。