• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

335例连续脓肿的经皮引流:初次引流结果及1年随访

Percutaneous drainage of 335 consecutive abscesses: results of primary drainage with 1-year follow-up.

作者信息

Lambiase R E, Deyoe L, Cronan J J, Dorfman G S

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence.

出版信息

Radiology. 1992 Jul;184(1):167-79. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1376932.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.184.1.1376932
PMID:1376932
Abstract

Retrospective review of percutaneous abscess drainage (PAD) of 335 abscesses in 323 consecutive patients was undertaken. Particular attention was directed to body location, associated organ system, communications and fistulae, and to the underlying immunologic status of the patient. One-year follow-up was available in all patients. Overall, the cure rate was 62.4% (209 of 335 abscesses), with a failure rate of 8.95% (30 of 335 abscesses). There were 14.2% (46 of 323 patients) deaths in the follow-up period, of which 4.6% (15 of 323 patients) were believed attributable to sepsis or septic complications. The overall complication rate was 9.8% (33 of 335 abscesses), most of which were minor in nature. For the patient exhibiting immunocompromise, representing 53.1% (172 of 323 patients) of the patient population, the cure rate was 53.4% (95 of 178 abscesses), which was significantly lower than the cure rate of 72.6% (114 of 157 abscesses) for the immunocompetent patient population (n = 151) (P less than .001). The recurrence rate was 2.1% (seven of 335 abscesses), with all recurrences within 3 months of initial drainage. PAD is effective and permanent treatment for both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients.

摘要

对323例连续患者的335处脓肿进行经皮脓肿引流(PAD)的回顾性研究。特别关注脓肿的身体部位、相关器官系统、连通情况和瘘管,以及患者的基础免疫状态。所有患者均进行了为期一年的随访。总体而言,治愈率为62.4%(335处脓肿中的209处),失败率为8.95%(335处脓肿中的30处)。随访期间有14.2%(323例患者中的46例)死亡,其中4.6%(323例患者中的15例)被认为归因于败血症或脓毒症并发症。总体并发症发生率为9.8%(335处脓肿中的33处),大多数并发症性质较轻。对于免疫功能低下的患者,占患者总数的53.1%(323例患者中的172例),治愈率为53.4%(178处脓肿中的95处),显著低于免疫功能正常患者群体(n = 151)的治愈率72.6%(157处脓肿中的114处)(P < 0.001)。复发率为2.1%(335处脓肿中的7处),所有复发均发生在初次引流后的3个月内。PAD对免疫功能低下和免疫功能正常的患者都是一种有效且持久的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous drainage of 335 consecutive abscesses: results of primary drainage with 1-year follow-up.335例连续脓肿的经皮引流:初次引流结果及1年随访
Radiology. 1992 Jul;184(1):167-79. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1376932.
2
Percutaneous abscess drainage.经皮脓肿引流术
Radiology. 1992 Jul;184(1):27-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609091.
3
[Percutaneous drainage treatment of abscess and fluid retention following abdominal surgery].[腹部手术后脓肿及积液的经皮引流治疗]
Chirurg. 1989 Dec;60(12):873-7.
4
[The subphrenic abscess. Surgical and/or percutaneous drainage].[膈下脓肿。手术及/或经皮引流]
Zentralbl Chir. 1989;114(16):1072-80.
5
Percutaneous management of pancreatic abscesses: long term results in a single center.经皮胰腺脓肿管理:单中心的长期结果。
Eur J Intern Med. 2011 Oct;22(5):e50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.01.015. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
6
[Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses].[经皮腹腔脓肿引流术]
Rev Med Chil. 1990 Jul;118(7):772-6.
7
[Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses. I. Technic and results].
Chirurg. 1985 Sep;56(9):579-83.
8
[Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses. II. Value in comparison with septic surgery].[经皮穿刺引流腹部脓肿。II. 与脓毒症手术相比的价值]
Chirurg. 1985 Sep;56(9):584-8.
9
[Results of percutaneous abscess drainage].[经皮脓肿引流的结果]
Rofo. 1983 Oct;139(4):400-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1055913.
10
Percutaneous drainage of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Jan;138(1):13-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.138.1.13.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver abscess and tracheal fistula induced by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report.经导管动脉化疗栓塞术诱发肝细胞癌致肝脓肿及气管瘘:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jun 6;12(16):2911-2916. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i16.2911.
2
Percutaneous catheter drainage in retroperitoneal abscesses: a single centre's 8-year experience.经皮导管引流术治疗腹膜后脓肿:单中心8年经验
Pol J Radiol. 2022 Apr 29;87:e238-e245. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.115815. eCollection 2022.
3
Safety and efficacy of USG-guided catheter drainage in liver abscesses.
超声引导下经皮肝穿刺置管引流术治疗肝脓肿的安全性和有效性。
Ann Afr Med. 2022 Jan-Mar;21(1):21-25. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_68_20.
4
Failure of nonoperative management in patients with acute diverticulitis complicated by abscess: a systematic review.急性憩室炎合并脓肿患者非手术治疗失败:系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jul;36(7):1367-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03899-6. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
5
A prospective study on the use of ultralow-dose computed tomography with iterative reconstruction for the follow-up of patients liver and renal abscess.前瞻性研究使用超低剂量 CT 迭代重建技术对肝、肾脓肿患者进行随访。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 12;16(2):e0246532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246532. eCollection 2021.
6
Percutaneous drainage of retroperitoneal abscesses: variables for success, failure, and recurrence.经皮引流治疗腹膜后脓肿:影响成功、失败和复发的因素。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020 Mar;26(2):124-130. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.19199.
7
Paired Drainage Catheter Insertion: Feasibility of Placing Two Catheters within the Same Complex Abscess Cavity as a Primary and Salvage Percutaneous Drainage Technique.双引流管置入术:在同一复杂脓肿腔中放置两根导管作为初始和挽救性经皮引流技术的可行性。
Acad Radiol. 2020 Feb;27(2):e1-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
8
Fluid Flow Patterns Through Drainage Catheters: Clinical Observations in 99 Patients.通过引流导管的流体流动模式:99例患者的临床观察
J La State Med Soc. 2018 Sep-Oct;170(5):146-150.
9
Percutaneous drainage and management of fluid collections associated with necrotic or cystic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis.经皮引流和处理腹部和骨盆中坏死或囊性肿瘤相关的积液。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Apr;44(4):1562-1566. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1854-z.
10
Pelvic abscess drainage: outcome with factors affecting the clinical success.盆腔脓肿引流:影响临床成功的因素及结果
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018 May-Jun;24(3):146-152. doi: 10.5152/dir.2018.16500.