Suppr超能文献

采用免疫细胞化学和生化方法测定人乳腺癌中的孕激素受体。

Progesterone receptor determined by immunocytochemical and biochemical methods in human breast cancer.

作者信息

Gasparini G, Pozza F, Dittadi R, Meli S, Cazzavillan S, Bevilacqua P

机构信息

St. Bortolo Regional Hospital, USSL 8, Vicenza, Italy.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1992;118(7):557-63. doi: 10.1007/BF01225273.

Abstract

Immunocytochemical assay (ICA) of the progesterone receptor (PgR) was performed on 152 patients with stage I-II breast cancer. We employed the rat monoclonal antibody KD-68 and a peroxidase/antiperoxidase displaying system. The results obtained by ICA (Pg(RICA)) were compared with those by the biochemical dextran-coated charcoal assay (PgRDCC). Comparing the two methods we found an overall agreement (accuracy) of 77.5%, a PgR(ICA) sensitivity of 83.5% and a specificity of 73%. Both methods were significantly associated with oestrogen receptor expression, detected by DCC (P less than 0.001 for PgRDCC and P = 0.0014 for PgR(ICA)). No significant association was found between PgR(ICA) or PgRDCC and the other clinicopathological features analysed. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the overall survival probability was 91% in PgRDCC-positive versus 81.5% in PgRDCC-negative patients (log-rank test, chi 2 = 0.91) compared to 87.5% in PgR(ICA)-positive versus 82% in PgR(ICA)-negative ones (log-rank test, chi 2 = 0.93). Disease-free survival probability was 74.5% in both PgRDCC-positive and PgRDCC-negative patients (log-rank test, chi 2 = 0.02) compared to 78% in PgR(ICA)-positive versus 71.5% in PgR(ICA)-negative cases (log-rank test, chi 2 = 0.37). The present study demonstrates that ICA is a reliable method to detect PgR, correlating well with the DCC assay. Moreover, the ICA assay seems to provide clinical information complementary to the biochemical method. The definition of its prognostic value in operable breast cancer needs additional studies, particularly in node-negative patients.

摘要

对152例I-II期乳腺癌患者进行了孕激素受体(PgR)的免疫细胞化学检测(ICA)。我们使用了大鼠单克隆抗体KD-68和过氧化物酶/抗过氧化物酶显示系统。将ICA获得的结果(Pg(RICA))与生化葡聚糖包被活性炭检测法(PgRDCC)的结果进行比较。比较这两种方法,我们发现总体一致性(准确性)为77.5%,PgR(ICA)的敏感性为83.5%,特异性为73%。两种方法均与通过DCC检测的雌激素受体表达显著相关(PgRDCC的P<0.001,PgR(ICA)的P = 0.0014)。未发现PgR(ICA)或PgRDCC与所分析的其他临床病理特征之间存在显著关联。中位随访36个月后,PgRDCC阳性患者的总生存概率为91%,而PgRDCC阴性患者为81.5%(对数秩检验,χ2 = 0.91),相比之下,PgR(ICA)阳性患者为87.5%,PgR(ICA)阴性患者为82%(对数秩检验,χ2 = 0.93)。PgRDCC阳性和PgRDCC阴性患者的无病生存概率均为74.5%(对数秩检验,χ2 = 0.02),相比之下,PgR(ICA)阳性患者为78%,PgR(ICA)阴性患者为71.5%(对数秩检验,χ2 = 0.37)。本研究表明,ICA是检测PgR的可靠方法,与DCC检测法相关性良好。此外,ICA检测似乎能提供与生化方法互补的临床信息。其在可手术乳腺癌中的预后价值的定义需要更多研究,尤其是在淋巴结阴性患者中。

相似文献

3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.用于乳腺癌的双膦酸盐及其他骨治疗药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer.雌激素和孕激素受体在乳腺癌治疗中的价值。
Cancer. 1980 Dec 15;46(12 Suppl):2884-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19801215)46:12+<2884::aid-cncr2820461429>3.0.co;2-u.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验