Horobin R W, Gerrits P O, Wright D J
Department of Biomedical Science, University, Sheffield, U.K.
J Microsc. 1992 May;166(Pt 2):199-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1992.tb01518.x.
Glycol methacrylate (GMA) sections of animal tissues were stained with a group of twenty-seven reagents of very varied chemical characteristics. The artefactual background staining of the resin was found to be dependent on the hydrophilic/lipophilic character of the staining reagent, as estimated from the logarithm of its octanol-water partition coefficient (log P). Intense background staining occurred with lipophilic stains, whose log P greater than 2. In keeping with this, use of GMA semi-permeable membranes for enzyme histochemistry failed to give staining when using a lipophilic substrate, probably because the substrate was trapped in the membrane. An analysis of other routine histochemical stains--in terms of the probable occurrence of high resin background staining and low tissue sensitivity--is made. A numerical guide is provided to help avoid artefacts resulting from hydrophobic and size effects. Note: small, hydrophilic reagents (log P less than 0; molecular weight less than 550 Da) are least likely to show either type of artefact. Conversely, reagents which are lipophilic, or/and of intermediate size (log P greater than 2; 550 less than ionic weight less than 1000 Da), give strong background staining.