Bryant D H, Rogers P
Thoracic Unit, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Chest. 1992 Sep;102(3):742-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.3.742.
In a recent study, it was suggested that the preservatives in ipratropium bromide nebulizer solution may cause a paradoxic bronchoconstrictor response in 20 percent or more of patients with stable asthma. The frequency of this response in patients with acute asthma is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of the usual dose of nebulized ipratropium bromide (0.25 mg) in patients with either stable or acute asthma using formulations with and without added preservatives. Twenty-five patients with stable asthma and 25 patients with acute asthma were studied. Each subject was given preservative-containing ipratropium bromide, preservative-free ipratropium bromide, pH 7 preservative-free ipratropium bromide, and saline solution in random order using a double-blind crossover technique with at least 4 h between drug administrations. Very frequent measurements of FEV1 were made for 30 min after each drug administration and then 5 mg of albuterol was nebulized and the FEV1 was measured again after another 30 min. Changes in FEV1 were expressed as a percentage of the predicted FEV1. Paradoxic bronchoconstriction to ipratropium was detected in only one patient with acute asthma (12 percent fall in FEV1) but in none of the patients with stable asthma. A 6 percent fall in FEV1 change occurred with the saline solution in this subject suggesting that the response may have been a nonspecific one due to increased bronchial responsiveness. The mean response (+/- 1 SD) to albuterol plus either preservative-containing ipratropium, preservative-free ipratropium, or pH7 preservative-free ipratropium was significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than the response to albuterol alone both in the patients with acute asthma (25 +/- 12 percent, 27 +/- 15 percent, 26 +/- 15 percent, and 20 +/- 15 percent, respectively) and stable asthma (26 +/- 7 percent, 25 +/- 8 percent, 24 +/- 6 percent, and 22 +/- 9 percent) supporting the use of ipratropium bromide as an additional bronchodilator in patients with asthma who do not show a satisfactory response to nebulized beta-adrenergic agonist.
在最近一项研究中,有人提出异丙托溴铵雾化溶液中的防腐剂可能会使20%或更多的稳定期哮喘患者出现反常性支气管收缩反应。急性哮喘患者中这种反应的发生率尚不清楚。本研究的目的是使用添加和未添加防腐剂的制剂,研究雾化异丙托溴铵常用剂量(0.25毫克)对稳定期或急性期哮喘患者的急性影响。研究了25例稳定期哮喘患者和25例急性哮喘患者。采用双盲交叉技术,在每次给药间隔至少4小时的情况下,给每位受试者随机依次给予含防腐剂的异丙托溴铵、不含防腐剂的异丙托溴铵、pH值为7的不含防腐剂的异丙托溴铵和生理盐水溶液。每次给药后30分钟内对第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)进行频繁测量,然后雾化5毫克沙丁胺醇,再过30分钟后再次测量FEV1。FEV1的变化以预测FEV1的百分比表示。仅在1例急性哮喘患者中检测到对异丙托溴铵的反常性支气管收缩(FEV1下降12%),而稳定期哮喘患者中未出现这种情况。该受试者中生理盐水溶液使FEV1变化下降了6%,这表明该反应可能是由于支气管反应性增加导致的非特异性反应。在急性哮喘患者(分别为25±12%、27±15%、26±15%和20±15%)和稳定期哮喘患者(分别为26±7%、25±8%、24±6%和22±9%)中,沙丁胺醇加含防腐剂的异丙托溴铵、不含防腐剂的异丙托溴铵或pH值为7的不含防腐剂的异丙托溴铵的平均反应(±1标准差)均显著大于(p<0.05)单独使用沙丁胺醇的反应,这支持在对雾化β-肾上腺素能激动剂反应不佳的哮喘患者中使用异丙托溴铵作为额外的支气管扩张剂。