Soukop M, McQuade B, Hunter E, Stewart A, Kaye S, Cassidy J, Kerr D, Khanna S, Smyth J, Coleman R
Medical Oncology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Oncology. 1992;49(4):295-304. doi: 10.1159/000227060.
This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study which included female breast cancer patients, receiving their first of 6 scheduled courses of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide greater than or equal to 500 mg/m2). Patients received an intravenous dose of 16 mg dexamethasone with either 8 mg ondansetron or 60 mg metoclopramide before chemotherapy, followed by oral dosing with 8 mg ondansetron or 20 mg metoclopramide 3 times daily for 5 days. A total of 93 patients were treated with ondansetron and 94 patients with metoclopramide. On day 1 of their first course of treatment 91 and 60% of patients in the ondansetron and metoclopramide groups respectively were free of emesis (p less than 0.001). Over the 5-day treatment period, the corresponding figures were 81 and 48% (p less than 0.001). The results for nausea also revealed highly statistically significant treatment differences (p less than 0.001) in favour of ondansetron for both day 1 and day 1-5 analyses of the first treatment course. Over the series of courses, 67% of patients receiving ondansetron completed all 6 courses with a maximum of 2 emetic episodes on their worst day, compared with 28% of patients receiving metoclopramide (p less than 0.001). A similar analysis for nausea revealed that 49% of patients receiving ondansetron completed all 6 courses with 'none' or 'mild' nausea compared with 27% of patients receiving metoclopramide (p less than 0.001). These differences were reflected in quality of life data (Rotterdam Symptom Checklist). After the first course of treatment, a statistically significant improvement (p = 0.002) in the psychological subscale scores was observed after ondansetron compared with metoclopramide. No differences were observed in the physical or functional activity subscales after the first course. However, the quality of life results over the series of courses revealed a more pronounced difference in favour of ondansetron in the psychological subscale scores (p less than 0.001) as well as trends in favour of ondansetron in the physical (p = 0.096) and functional activity (p = 0.056) subscales. Extrapyramidal symptoms were reported in 19% of patients in the metoclopramide group and resulted in 15% of patients withdrawing from their randomised anti-emetic schedule, either during or between treatment courses. Other adverse events were generally minor in nature and did not necessitate withdrawal from treatment. In conclusion, this study shows that ondansetron is significantly superior to metoclopramide (each with a single pre-treatment dose of dexamethasone) in the control of emesis over 6 courses of chemotherapy for breast cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组研究,纳入了接受6个预定化疗疗程中首个疗程(环磷酰胺剂量大于或等于500mg/m²)的女性乳腺癌患者。患者在化疗前静脉注射16mg地塞米松,同时给予8mg昂丹司琼或60mg甲氧氯普胺,随后口服8mg昂丹司琼或20mg甲氧氯普胺,每日3次,共5天。共有93例患者接受昂丹司琼治疗,94例患者接受甲氧氯普胺治疗。在首个疗程的第1天,昂丹司琼组和甲氧氯普胺组分别有91%和60%的患者未出现呕吐(p<0.001)。在5天的治疗期内,相应数字分别为81%和48%(p<0.001)。恶心的结果也显示,在首个疗程第1天和第1 - 5天的分析中,昂丹司琼在治疗效果上具有高度统计学显著差异(p<0.001),更有利于控制恶心。在整个疗程系列中,接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者中有67%完成了全部6个疗程,在最糟糕的一天最多有2次呕吐发作,而接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者这一比例为28%(p<0.001)。对恶心的类似分析显示,接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者中有49%完成了全部6个疗程,恶心程度为“无”或“轻度”,而接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者这一比例为27%(p<0.001)。这些差异反映在生活质量数据(鹿特丹症状清单)中。在首个疗程治疗后,与甲氧氯普胺相比,昂丹司琼治疗后心理子量表评分有统计学显著改善(p = 0.002)。首个疗程后,身体或功能活动子量表未观察到差异。然而,在整个疗程系列中,生活质量结果显示,在心理子量表评分上更明显有利于昂丹司琼(p<0.001),在身体(p = 0.096)和功能活动(p = 0.056)子量表上也有有利于昂丹司琼的趋势。甲氧氯普胺组19%的患者报告有锥体外系症状,导致15%的患者在治疗疗程期间或疗程之间退出随机抗呕吐方案。其他不良事件一般性质较轻,无需退出治疗。总之,本研究表明,在乳腺癌6个疗程的化疗中,昂丹司琼在控制呕吐方面显著优于甲氧氯普胺(均联合单次预处理剂量的地塞米松)。(摘要截选至400字)