du Bois A, McKenna C J, Andersson H, Lahousen M, Kitchener H, Pinter T, Capstick V, Wilkinson J R
St. Vincentius-Krankenhäuser, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
Oncology. 1997 Jan-Feb;54(1):7-14. doi: 10.1159/000227652.
A double-blind, parallel-group study in 189 ovarian cancer patients compared the efficacy of ondansetron 8 mg i.v. (OND) and metoclopramide 60 mg i.v. (MET) both in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. in the prevention of carboplatin-induced emesis. On day 1, complete or major control of emesis (0-2 emetic episodes) was observed in 97% patients from the OND group compared with 74% patients from the MET group (p < 0.001). Similarly, a worst-day analysis over days 1-3 showed complete or major control of emesis in 87% patients (OND) compared wth 66% patients (MET) (p < 0.001). Similar findings in favour of the OND group were observed for nausea grade on day 1 and the worst-day grade during days 1-3. OND was better tolerated than MET. Fewer patients from the OND group (13%) reported adverse events compared with the MET group (21%). Extrapyramidal type symptoms were observed in 6 (6%) patients from the MET group (paraesthesia, involuntary movement of the jaw and tongue, and restlessness), compared with none from the OND group. Ondansetron plus dexamethasone is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment and is significantly superior to metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in the prevention of carboplatin-induced emesis.
一项针对189例卵巢癌患者的双盲平行组研究,比较了静脉注射8毫克昂丹司琼(OND)和静脉注射60毫克甲氧氯普胺(MET)联合静脉注射20毫克地塞米松预防卡铂所致呕吐的疗效。在第1天,OND组97%的患者呕吐得到完全或主要控制(呕吐发作0 - 2次),而MET组为74%(p < 0.001)。同样,在第1 - 3天的最差日分析显示,OND组87%的患者呕吐得到完全或主要控制,而MET组为66%(p < 0.001)。在第1天的恶心程度以及第1 - 3天的最差日恶心程度方面,也观察到了有利于OND组的类似结果。OND的耐受性优于MET。OND组报告不良事件的患者(13%)少于MET组(21%)。MET组有6例(6%)患者出现锥体外系症状(感觉异常、颌部和舌头不自主运动以及烦躁不安),而OND组无此现象。昂丹司琼加地塞米松是一种高效且耐受性良好的治疗方法,在预防卡铂所致呕吐方面明显优于甲氧氯普胺加地塞米松。