Cunningham D, Dicato M, Verweij J, Crombez R, de Mulder P, du Bois A, Stewart A, Smyth J, Selby P, van Straelen D, Parideans R, McQuade B, McRae J
Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.
Ann Oncol. 1996 Mar;7(3):277-82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010572.
This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ondansetron plus dexamethasone (O + D) with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus lorazepam (M + D + L) over three consecutive courses of cisplatin chemotherapy.
This was an international, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study. O+D patients were randomised to receive ondansetron 8 mg intravenously (i.v.) plus dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. prior to cisplatin (50-100 mg/m2) chemotherapy. On the following 4 days they were treated with ondansetron 8 mg bd orally and dexamethasone 4 mg bd orally. M + D + L patients were randomised to receive metoclopramide 3 mg/kg i.v., dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. and lorazepam 1.5 mg/m2 i.v. (max 3 mg) prior to cisplatin chemotherapy and a further dose of metoclopramide 3 mg/kg i.v. approximately 2 hours following the first dose of metoclopramide. Treatment for the following 4 days was metoclopramide 40 mg tds and dexamethasone 4 mg bd orally. Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were recruited into the study (117 patients received O + D and 120 received M + D + L).
On the first course chemotherapy, O + D was significantly superior to the M + D + L regimen for complete control of emesis (days 1-5, 54% versus 37%, respectively, P = 0.014). This was maintained over the three treatment cycles; 38% of O + D and 20% of M + D + L patients remained free of emesis (P = 0.003). Maintenance of control of nausea grade as none or mild on days 1-5 over the three courses was significantly better in the O + D group (48%) than in the M + D + L (26%, P = 0.003). The most commonly occurring adverse events in the O + D group were constipation (25%) and headache (19%). In the M + D + L group drowsiness (38% of patients), malaise/fatigue (16% of patients), constipation (13% of patients), anxiety (11% of patients) and dizziness (10% of patients) were the most commonly reported adverse events. Extrapyramidal symptoms were reported by 20% of patients in the M + D + L group. Despite the inclusion of lorazepam, 14% of patients in the M + D + L group were withdrawn from the study due to extrapyramidal symptoms, which in the opinion of the investigators, were probably or almost certainly related to study medication.
This study show that O + D is significantly more effective and better tolerated than M + D + L for the control of emesis and nausea over a series of three courses of cisplatin chemotherapy.
本研究旨在比较昂丹司琼联合地塞米松(O + D)与甲氧氯普胺联合地塞米松及劳拉西泮(M + D + L)在连续三个疗程顺铂化疗中的疗效和耐受性。
这是一项国际多中心双盲双模拟平行组研究。O + D组患者在顺铂(50 - 100mg/m²)化疗前随机接受静脉注射昂丹司琼8mg加地塞米松20mg。在接下来的4天里,他们口服昂丹司琼8mg每日两次和地塞米松4mg每日两次。M + D + L组患者在顺铂化疗前随机接受静脉注射甲氧氯普胺3mg/kg、地塞米松20mg和劳拉西泮1.5mg/m²(最大3mg),并在首次注射甲氧氯普胺约2小时后再静脉注射一剂甲氧氯普胺3mg/kg。接下来4天的治疗为口服甲氧氯普胺40mg每日三次和地塞米松4mg每日两次。共有237名患者纳入研究(117名患者接受O + D,120名患者接受M + D + L)。
在第一个疗程化疗中,O + D在完全控制呕吐方面显著优于M + D + L方案(第1 - 5天,分别为54%对37%,P = 0.014)。在三个治疗周期中均保持这一优势;38%的O + D组患者和20%的M + D + L组患者无呕吐(P = 0.003)。在三个疗程中第1 - 5天恶心控制维持为无或轻度的情况,O + D组(48%)显著优于M + D + L组(26%,P = 0.003)。O + D组最常见的不良事件是便秘(25%)和头痛(19%)。在M + D + L组,嗜睡(38%的患者)、不适/疲劳(16%的患者)、便秘(13%的患者)、焦虑(11%的患者)和头晕(10%的患者)是最常报告的不良事件。M + D + L组有20%的患者报告有锥体外系症状。尽管使用了劳拉西泮,M + D + L组仍有14%的患者因锥体外系症状退出研究,研究者认为这些症状可能或几乎肯定与研究用药有关。
本研究表明,在连续三个疗程的顺铂化疗中,O + D在控制呕吐和恶心方面比M + D + L显著更有效且耐受性更好。