Suppr超能文献

顺铂重复疗程所致呕吐的最佳止吐治疗:昂丹司琼加地塞米松与甲氧氯普胺、地塞米松加劳拉西泮的比较

Optimum anti-emetic therapy for cisplatin induced emesis over repeat courses: ondansetron plus dexamethasone compared with metoclopramide, dexamethasone plus lorazepam.

作者信息

Cunningham D, Dicato M, Verweij J, Crombez R, de Mulder P, du Bois A, Stewart A, Smyth J, Selby P, van Straelen D, Parideans R, McQuade B, McRae J

机构信息

Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, U.K.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 1996 Mar;7(3):277-82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010572.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ondansetron plus dexamethasone (O + D) with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone plus lorazepam (M + D + L) over three consecutive courses of cisplatin chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an international, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study. O+D patients were randomised to receive ondansetron 8 mg intravenously (i.v.) plus dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. prior to cisplatin (50-100 mg/m2) chemotherapy. On the following 4 days they were treated with ondansetron 8 mg bd orally and dexamethasone 4 mg bd orally. M + D + L patients were randomised to receive metoclopramide 3 mg/kg i.v., dexamethasone 20 mg i.v. and lorazepam 1.5 mg/m2 i.v. (max 3 mg) prior to cisplatin chemotherapy and a further dose of metoclopramide 3 mg/kg i.v. approximately 2 hours following the first dose of metoclopramide. Treatment for the following 4 days was metoclopramide 40 mg tds and dexamethasone 4 mg bd orally. Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were recruited into the study (117 patients received O + D and 120 received M + D + L).

RESULTS

On the first course chemotherapy, O + D was significantly superior to the M + D + L regimen for complete control of emesis (days 1-5, 54% versus 37%, respectively, P = 0.014). This was maintained over the three treatment cycles; 38% of O + D and 20% of M + D + L patients remained free of emesis (P = 0.003). Maintenance of control of nausea grade as none or mild on days 1-5 over the three courses was significantly better in the O + D group (48%) than in the M + D + L (26%, P = 0.003). The most commonly occurring adverse events in the O + D group were constipation (25%) and headache (19%). In the M + D + L group drowsiness (38% of patients), malaise/fatigue (16% of patients), constipation (13% of patients), anxiety (11% of patients) and dizziness (10% of patients) were the most commonly reported adverse events. Extrapyramidal symptoms were reported by 20% of patients in the M + D + L group. Despite the inclusion of lorazepam, 14% of patients in the M + D + L group were withdrawn from the study due to extrapyramidal symptoms, which in the opinion of the investigators, were probably or almost certainly related to study medication.

CONCLUSION

This study show that O + D is significantly more effective and better tolerated than M + D + L for the control of emesis and nausea over a series of three courses of cisplatin chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较昂丹司琼联合地塞米松(O + D)与甲氧氯普胺联合地塞米松及劳拉西泮(M + D + L)在连续三个疗程顺铂化疗中的疗效和耐受性。

患者与方法

这是一项国际多中心双盲双模拟平行组研究。O + D组患者在顺铂(50 - 100mg/m²)化疗前随机接受静脉注射昂丹司琼8mg加地塞米松20mg。在接下来的4天里,他们口服昂丹司琼8mg每日两次和地塞米松4mg每日两次。M + D + L组患者在顺铂化疗前随机接受静脉注射甲氧氯普胺3mg/kg、地塞米松20mg和劳拉西泮1.5mg/m²(最大3mg),并在首次注射甲氧氯普胺约2小时后再静脉注射一剂甲氧氯普胺3mg/kg。接下来4天的治疗为口服甲氧氯普胺40mg每日三次和地塞米松4mg每日两次。共有237名患者纳入研究(117名患者接受O + D,120名患者接受M + D + L)。

结果

在第一个疗程化疗中,O + D在完全控制呕吐方面显著优于M + D + L方案(第1 - 5天,分别为54%对37%,P = 0.014)。在三个治疗周期中均保持这一优势;38%的O + D组患者和20%的M + D + L组患者无呕吐(P = 0.003)。在三个疗程中第1 - 5天恶心控制维持为无或轻度的情况,O + D组(48%)显著优于M + D + L组(26%,P = 0.003)。O + D组最常见的不良事件是便秘(25%)和头痛(19%)。在M + D + L组,嗜睡(38%的患者)、不适/疲劳(16%的患者)、便秘(13%的患者)、焦虑(11%的患者)和头晕(10%的患者)是最常报告的不良事件。M + D + L组有20%的患者报告有锥体外系症状。尽管使用了劳拉西泮,M + D + L组仍有14%的患者因锥体外系症状退出研究,研究者认为这些症状可能或几乎肯定与研究用药有关。

结论

本研究表明,在连续三个疗程的顺铂化疗中,O + D在控制呕吐和恶心方面比M + D + L显著更有效且耐受性更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验